On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 03:34:59PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Cedric Le Goater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] add the clone64() and unshare64() syscalls
>
> This patch adds 2 new syscalls :
>
> long sys_clone64(unsigned long flags_high, unsigned long flags_low,
>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 02:04:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:23:13 -0500
> Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Functions to facilitate reading and writing to the eCryptfs
> > miscellaneous device handle. This will replace the netlink interface
> > as the pref
Sukadev,
Any corresponding test cases for LTP. We just have UTS, PID & SYSVIPC
Namespace till now.
Regards--
Subrata
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 10:59 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Some simple helper patches to enable implementation of multiple PTY
> (or device) namespaces.
>
>[PATCH 1
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 05:47:50PM -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote:
> If I cannot find out soon why the netlink interface in eCryptfs
> broke, I am likely to just send a patch to disable it in 2.6.24 and
> 2.6.25.
This patch yanks key module support out of eCryptfs. In the event that
the netlink bug
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 04:34:02PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 15:23:13 -0500
> > Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> > > + rc = ecryptfs_find_daemon_by_euid(&daemon, current->euid);
> > > + if (daemon->pi
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them with the LTP.
Of course it depends on the order of priority, and as I am learning the
tricks of container/ltp .
Regards, Veerendra C
Linux Technology Center, India Software Labs, Ban
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 04:51:29PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>. echo "LONG XX" > /proc/self/next_id
> next object to be created will have an id set to XX
>. echo "LONG X0 ... X" > /proc/self/next_id
> next object to be created will have its ids set to XX0, ... X
> This
Ben, please pull from
git://git.openvz.org/pub/ubuntu-hardy-openvz openvz
to receive fix for "non-overwriting cp(1) in VE" bug, OpenVZ users were
reporting in our forums:
Konstantin Khlebnikov (1):
openvz: make stat and fstat agree on (st_dev, st_ino) in VE
debian/binary-custom.
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 10:34:06AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Michael Halcrow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > @@ -206,6 +210,7 @@ ecryptfs_spawn_daemon(struct ecryptfs_daemon **daemon,
> > uid_t euid, pid_t pid)
> > goto out;
> > }
> > (*daemon)->euid = euid;
> > + (*da
This patch effectively reverts commit d0498d9ae1a5cebac363e38907266d5cd2eedf89
aka "[NET]: Do not allocate unneeded memory for dev->priv alignment."
It was found to be buggy because of final unconditional += NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST
removal.
For example, for sizeof(struct net_device) being 2048 bytes, "
Hi Alexander,
Alexander GQ Gerasiov wrote:
> Hello there.
>
> I'm using OpenVZ on my desktop, where I use nvidia-glx. When I tried to
> switch to OpenVZ I met strange problem: Xserver fails to start with
> message
>
> (EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA graphics device PCI:1:0:0.
> (
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 07:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The syntax is one of:
>. echo "LONG XX" > /proc/self/task//next_id
> next object to be created will have an id set to XX
>. echo "LONG X0 ... X" > /proc/self/task//next_id
> next object to be created will have its ids s
Remove the obsolete and buggy netlink interface to the userspace
daemon.
Signed-off-by: Michael Halcrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/ecryptfs/Makefile |2 +-
fs/ecryptfs/ecryptfs_kernel.h | 12 --
fs/ecryptfs/main.c| 15 +--
fs/ecryptfs/messaging.c | 31 ++
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 07:44 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>The syntax is one of:
>> . echo "LONG XX" > /proc/self/task//next_id
>> next object to be created will have an id set to XX
>> . echo "LONG X0 ... X" > /proc/self/task//next_id
>> next object to be cre
Hi,
the proposed agenda for the mini-summit is up (and editable)
at http://wiki.openvz.org/Containers/Mini-summit_2008. Please
take a look and edit or email the list with any suggested updates.
Right now I'm thinking 9-11am namespaces, 11-12 for general cgroup, 12-2
lunch, 2-3 for continued cgro
Hi, all,
I have a system(Debian) installed with Oracle 10g, then if I install an OpenVZ,
can I contain that Oracle in a Virtual private server?
and how can I do so?
Warm regards,
Shawn D.
2008-04-22
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://o
Hi Shawn,
duyuyang wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> I have a system(Debian) installed with Oracle 10g, then if I install an
> OpenVZ, can I contain that Oracle in a Virtual private server?
>
> and how can I do so?
Yes, of course it's possible. I would advise You to look at the following
article in our wik
17 matches
Mail list logo
