Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
Hi,
Den basically banned iptables in netns via this patch
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
...
, however, at least some of netfilter pieces are ready for usage in netns
and it would be nice to unlock them before release.
If I'm deciphering chengelog
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:46 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > I'm now considering following logic. How do you think ?
> >
> > Assume: move TASK from group:CURR to group:DEST.
> >
> > == move_task(TASK, CURR, DEST)
> >
> > if (DEST's limit is unlimited)
> > moving
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:29:09 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:14:37 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:46 +0900 (JST)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> >
> > > > I'm now considering follow
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:14:37 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:44:46 +0900 (JST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>
> > > I'm now considering following logic. How do you think ?
> > >
> > > Assume: move TASK from group:CURR to group:DEST.
>
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:45:14 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > > having said that, if you decide to put too large tasks into
> > > a cgroup with too small limit, i don't think that there are
> > > many choices besides OOM-kill and allowing "exceed".
> > >
> > IMHO, allow
> > having said that, if you decide to put too large tasks into
> > a cgroup with too small limit, i don't think that there are
> > many choices besides OOM-kill and allowing "exceed".
> >
> IMHO, allowing exceed is harmfull without changing the definition of "limit".
> "limit" is hard-limit, now,
> I'm now considering following logic. How do you think ?
>
> Assume: move TASK from group:CURR to group:DEST.
>
> == move_task(TASK, CURR, DEST)
>
> if (DEST's limit is unlimited)
> moving TASK
> return success.
>
> usage = check_usage_of_task(TASK).
>
> /* try to reserve enough r
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:03:45 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Or, instead of implementing rollback in kernel,
> > > how about making user(or middle ware?) re-echo pid to rollbak
> > > on failure?
> > >
> >
> > "If the users does well, the system works in better way" is O.K
Quoting Dave Hansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Rather than just documenting this in the readme, actually spit
> out a warning on it.
>
> You can pull from: git://git.sr71.net/~dave/cryo-forhallyn.git/
>
> -- Dave
Thanks, merged.
-serge
___
Containers mail
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 17:26:37 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is a trial to move "usage" from old cg to new cg at task move.
> > > Finally, you'll see the problems we have to handle are failure and
> > > rollback.
> > >
> > > This one's Basic algorithm is
> > >
> >
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 21:57:03 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > > 5. try to move charges as your patch does.
> > >if the target cgroup's usage is going to exceed the limit,
> > >try to shrink it. if it failed, just leave it exceeded.
> > >(ie. no rollback)
> >
Rather than just documenting this in the readme, actually spit
out a warning on it.
You can pull from: git://git.sr71.net/~dave/cryo-forhallyn.git/
-- Dave
___
Containers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinf
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Benjamin Thery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Greg,
> >
> > Here is an updated version of the sysfs tagged directories that improves
> > a bit the situation over the previous one.
> >
> > I've modified the patch 09 ("Enable tag
Quoting Benjamin Thery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Greg,
>
> Here is an updated version of the sysfs tagged directories that improves
> a bit the situation over the previous one.
>
> I've modified the patch 09 ("Enable tagging for net_class directories in
> sysfs") to be a bit less intrusive in sysf
Quoting Benjamin Thery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Mark the /sys/kernel/uids directory to be tagged so that processes in
> different user namespaces can remount /sys and see their own uid
> listings.
>
> Without this patch, having CONFIG_FAIR_SCHED=y makes user namespaces
> unusable, because when you
>From faa707a44b971f5f3bf24e6a0c760ccb4ad278e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Serge Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:57:32 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cgroup_clone: use pid of newly created task for new cgroup
cgroup_clone creates a new cgroup with the pid of the task. This wor
Quoting kathys ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> Quoting Nadia Derbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>
>>> Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>>
Quoting Nadia Derbey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Cedric Le Goater wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Loo
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 01:33 +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
>
> + cgroup_unlock();
> +
> + count = sprintf(page, "CommitLimit: %8lu kB\n"
> + "Committed_AS: %8lu kB\n",
> + K(allowed), K(committed));
> + ret = simple_read_from_b
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 01:33 +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> + preempt_disable();
> + committed = atomic_long_read(&p->vm_committed_space);
> + atomic_long_sub(committed, &old_mem->vmacct.vm_committed_space);
> + atomic_long_add(committed, &mem->vmacct.vm_committed_space);
> +
Hi,
Den basically banned iptables in netns via this patch
--- a/net/netfilter/core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/core.c
@@ -165,14 +165,6 @@ int nf_hook_slow(int pf, unsigned int hook, struct sk_buff
*skb,
unsigned int verdict;
int ret = 0;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_NS
- struct net *net
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:50:32 +0900 (JST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
>
> > > 3. Use Lazy Manner
> > > When the task moves, we can mark the pages used by it as
> > > "Wrong Charge, Should be dropped", and add them some penalty in the
> > > LRU.
> > > Pros.
> >
Fix missing initialization in save_msgq_data() that triggers a segfault
in realloc() when cr is compiled with -g.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Thery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
container_ckpt.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: cryodev/container_ckpt.c
==
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:32:58 +0200
>>> Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Provide distinct cgroup VM overcommit accounting and handling using the
memory
resource controller.
>>> Could you expl
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:35:50 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, Kamezawa-san.
>
> Sorry for late reply.
>
> On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:52:35 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Move Usage at Task Move (just an experimantal for discussion)
> > I tested this
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 14:50:32 +0900 (JST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (YAMAMOTO Takashi) wrote:
> > 3. Use Lazy Manner
> > When the task moves, we can mark the pages used by it as
> > "Wrong Charge, Should be dropped", and add them some penalty in the
> > LRU.
> > Pros.
> > - no compl
Balbir Singh wrote:
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:32:58 +0200
>> Andrea Righi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Provide distinct cgroup VM overcommit accounting and handling using the
>>> memory
>>> resource controller.
>>>
>> Could you explain the benefits of this even when
Hi, Kamezawa-san.
Sorry for late reply.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008 10:52:35 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Move Usage at Task Move (just an experimantal for discussion)
> I tested this but don't think bug-free.
>
> In current memcg, when task moves to a new cg, the usage remains i
27 matches
Mail list logo
