H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since the issue of PTY namespaces came up (and was rejected) back in April,
> I have thought a little bit about changing ptys to be tied directly into a
> devpts instance. devpts would then be a "normal" filesystem, which can be
> mounted multiple times
Quoting Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> "Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Ok I wasn't thinking right. We still can't get to a user_ns from
> > an inode *.
> >
> > So playing with this a bit tonight, it seems like the best way
> > to pass the user_namespace up to the fs
Kyle Moffett wrote:
>
> Here's my suggestion:
>
> By default, without any mount options, use the current "legacy"
> behavior. The devpts filesystem would point to a "global" instance on
> the whole box, controlled by the traditional /dev/ptmx device node.
> There would *NOT* be a /dev/pts/ptmx n
On Saturday, 2 of August 2008, Cedric Le Goater wrote:
> Matt Helsley wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 00:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, 1 of August 2008, Matt Helsley wrote:
> >>> This patch implements a new freezer subsystem in the control groups
> >>> framework.
> >>> It pro
On Saturday, 2 of August 2008, Matt Helsley wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 00:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, 1 of August 2008, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2008-08-01 at 16:27 +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Le Thu, 31 Jul 2008 22:07:01
Le Fri, 01 Aug 2008 12:08:09 -0700,
Matt Helsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> How about making it depend on a combination of CONFIG
> variables? Here's an RFC PATCH. Completely untested.
It solves my kernel size increase problem, so it's perfectly fine for
me.
Thanks!
Thomas
--
Thomas
On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:12:21AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 2. Permissions on /dev/ptmx would not be persistent, and would have to
> be set via devpts mount options (unless they're 0666 root.tty, which
> would presumably be the default.)
On Debian based systems /dev/ptmx is 0666 root
Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-08-02 at 00:58 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Friday, 1 of August 2008, Matt Helsley wrote:
>>> This patch implements a new freezer subsystem in the control groups
>>> framework.
>>> It provides a way to stop and resume execution of all tasks in a cgroup b
