On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Yup, indeed. :)
> honestly, I talked about the same thingk recently "lowmemory android driver
> not needed?" thread.
>
Yeah, I proposed /dev/mem_notify being made as a client of cgroups there
in http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123200623628685
H
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>
> > Confused.
> >
> > As far as I know, people want the method of flexible cache treating.
> > but oom seems less flexible than userland notification.
> >
> > Why do you think notification is bad?
> >
>
> There're a couple of proposals that have
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> Confused.
>
> As far as I know, people want the method of flexible cache treating.
> but oom seems less flexible than userland notification.
>
> Why do you think notification is bad?
>
There're a couple of proposals that have been discussed recentl
* KOSAKI Motohiro [2009-01-27 16:02:34]:
> Hi
>
> > > > As Alan Cox suggested/wondered in this thread,
> > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/12/235 , this is a container group based
> > > > approach
> > > > to override the oom killer selection without losing all the benefits of
> > > > the
>
Hi
> > > As Alan Cox suggested/wondered in this thread,
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/12/235 , this is a container group based
> > > approach
> > > to override the oom killer selection without losing all the benefits of
> > > the
> > > current oom killer heuristics and oom_adj interface.
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:03:32 -0600
"Serge E. Hallyn" wrote:
> Implement multiple mounts of the mqueue file system, and
> link it to usage of CLONE_NEWIPC.
>
> Each ipc ns has a corresponding mqueuefs superblock. When
> a user does clone(CLONE_NEWIPC) or unshare(CLONE_NEWIPC), the
> unshare will
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:03:22 -0600
"Serge E. Hallyn" wrote:
> Move mqueue vfsmount plus a few tunables into the
> ipc_namespace struct. The CONFIG_IPC_NS boolean
> and the ipc_namespace struct will serve both the
> posix message queue namespaces and the SYSV ipc
> namespaces.
>
>
> ...
>
> ---
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:02:48 -0600
"Serge E. Hallyn" wrote:
> IPC namespaces are completely disjoint id->object mappings.
> A task can pass CLONE_NEWIPC to unshare and clone to get
> a new, empty, IPC namespace. Until now this has supported
> SYSV IPC.
>
> Most Posix IPC is done in userspace.
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:24:31 +0530
Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Nikanth Karthikesan [2009-01-21 16:38:21]:
>
> > As Alan Cox suggested/wondered in this thread,
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/12/235 , this is a container group based
> > approach
> > to override the oom killer selection without lo
* Nikanth Karthikesan [2009-01-21 16:38:21]:
> As Alan Cox suggested/wondered in this thread,
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/1/12/235 , this is a container group based approach
> to override the oom killer selection without losing all the benefits of the
> current oom killer heuristics and oom_ad
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 07:14:04PM +0900, Ryo Tsuruta wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> Thanks for your comments.
>
> > I am not very sure why dm-ioband folks want to enable IO control on any
> > xyz block device but in the past I got two responses.
> >
> > 1. Need to control end devices which don't have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
