On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Glauber Costa wrote
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 1fd7867..e894a4f 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
> @@ -1211,9 +1211,9 @@ static int parse_cgroupfs_options(char *data, struct
> cgroup_sb_opts *opts)
>
On Fri 16-12-11 17:02:51, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 12/16/2011 04:32 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> >So why do we need kmem accounting when tcp (the only user at the moment)
> >doesn't use it?
>
> Well, a bit historical. I needed a basic placeholder for it, since
> it tcp is officially kmem. As t
Hi Arnaldo,
Could you review and commit this patch. It's quite common functionality,
which allow to get events more effectively and to avoid losing events.
All other patches may be postponed, because Arun Sharma wants to suggest
your version of "Profiling sleep times".
Thanks.
On 12/07/201
On Thu 15-12-11 16:29:18, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 09:04 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >[Now with the current patch version, I hope]
> >On Mon 12-12-11 11:47:01, Glauber Costa wrote:
[...]
> >>@@ -3848,10 +3862,17 @@ static inline u64 mem_cgroup_usage(struct
> >>mem_cgroup *memcg, bool swa
On Wed 14-12-11 17:38:44, Michal Hocko wrote:
> Sorry for jumping in that late but I was busy recently...
And obviously an old version of the patch in my mailbox. I will comment
on the v9 now. Sorry...
[...]
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech R
Sorry for jumping in that late but I was busy recently...
On Fri 25-11-11 15:38:07, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch lays down the foundation for the kernel memory component
> of the Memory Controller.
>
> As of today, I am only laying down the following files:
>
> * memory.independent_kmem_li
[Now with the current patch version, I hope]
On Mon 12-12-11 11:47:01, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch lays down the foundation for the kernel memory component
> of the Memory Controller.
>
> As of today, I am only laying down the following files:
>
> * memory.independent_kmem_limit
Maybe ha
Hi,
On 12/13/2011 01:07 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Glauber Costa
> Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:47:00 +0400
>
>> This series fixes all the few comments raised in the last round,
>> and seem to have acquired consensus from the memcg side.
>>
>> Dave, do you think it is acceptable now from the n
13.12.2011 14:04, Glauber Costa пишет:
On 12/13/2011 02:03 PM, Kinsbursky Stanislav wrote:
13.12.2011 13:13, Glauber Costa пишет:
On 12/13/2011 01:02 PM, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
13.12.2011 02:52, Andrew Morton пишет:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:50:00 +0300
Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
This r
Hi Ingo,
Please consider pulling from:
git://github.com/acmel/linux.git perf/core
Regards,
- Arnaldo
Andrew Vagin (1):
perf tools: Add ability to synthesize event according to a sample
Robert Richter (2):
perf script: Fix mem leaks and NULL pointer checks around strdup()s
perf s
13.12.2011 13:13, Glauber Costa пишет:
On 12/13/2011 01:02 PM, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
13.12.2011 02:52, Andrew Morton пишет:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:50:00 +0300
Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
This routine is required for SUNRPC sysctl's, which are going to be
allocated,
processed and destro
On 12/06/2011 07:19 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:03:31PM +0300, Andrew Vagin escreveu:
>> It's opposition of perf_session__parse_sample.
>>
>> v2: fixed mistakes which David Arhen found
>
> Ok, I'm taking this one, David, can I added an 'Acked-by: you"? Or eve
IOW a /proc namespace coupled to cgroup scope would do what you want.
Now my head hurts..
Mine too. The idea is good, but too broad. Boils down to: How do you
couple them? And none of the methods I thought about seemed to make any
sense.
If we really want to have the values in /proc being opt
(12/11/11 9:45 AM), Glauber Costa wrote:
> There is no reason to have a flags field, and then a separate
> bool field just to indicate if 'none' subsystem were explicitly
> requested.
>
> Make it a flag
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro
___
(12/11/11 9:45 AM), Glauber Costa wrote:
> There is no reason to have a flags field, and then a separate
> bool field just to indicate if the clone_children flag is set.
> Make it a flag
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa
> ---
> kernel/cgroup.c |6 +++---
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+),
From: Andrew Vagin
It's the counterpart of perf_session__parse_sample.
v2: fixed mistakes found by David Ahern.
v3: s/data/sample/
s/perf_event__change_sample/perf_event__synthesize_sample
Reviewed-by: David Ahern
Cc: Arun Sharma
Cc: David Ahern
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Paul Mackerras
Cc: P
> -static int notify_on_release(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> +static inline int notify_on_release(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> {
> return test_bit(CGRP_NOTIFY_ON_RELEASE,&cgrp->flags);
> }
>
> -static int clone_children(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> +static inline int clone_children(const
> How about this?
>
> val = !!val;
>
> /*
> * This follows the same hierarchy restrictions than
> * mem_cgroup_hierarchy_write()
> */
> if (!parent || !parent->use_hierarchy) {
> if (list_empty(&cgroup->children))
>
Hi Ingo,
Please consider pulling from:
git://github.com/acmel/linux.git perf/urgent
Regards,
- Arnaldo
Andrew Vagin (1):
perf header: Use event_name() to get an event name
Anton Blanchard (1):
perf stat: Failure with "Operation not supported"
tools/perf/builtin-stat.c |3 ++-
On 12/5/11 11:15 PM, Andrey Vagin wrote:
Arun Sharma said, that the second versions of patches works ok for him.
(Arun is the first user of this functionality after me.)
Yes - Andrey's patches (v2) have been functional for me when used via:
perf record -agP -e sched:sched_switch --filter "pre
From: Andrew Vagin
perf_evsel.name may be not initialized
Cc: David Ahern
Cc: Paul Mackerras
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Cc: Arun Sharma
Cc: devel@openvz.org
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1322471015-107825-2-git-send-email-ava...@openvz.org
Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carval
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Trond Myklebust
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 11:42 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:40:30AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>> > I mean that I'm perfectly entitled to do
>> >
>> > 'modprobe -r blocklayoutdriver'
>> >
>> > and when I do th
- Original Message -
> Hi Dave,
>
> could you please advise is it possible to process core dump remotely?
No, not any more.
Actually I did implement that capability several years ago, where you
could build a remote "crashd" daemon that you could connect to in order
to access dumpfiles
> -Original Message-
> From: Stanislav Kinsbursky [mailto:skinsbur...@parallels.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:19 PM
> To: Peng, Tao
> Cc: trond.mykleb...@netapp.com; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Pavel Emelianov;
> ne...@suse.de;
> net...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.
Em Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 11:15:07AM +0400, Andrey Vagin escreveu:
> Hello Arnaldo,
>
> I found, that you commit patches for perf. Could you review this part?
>
> Arun Sharma said, that the second versions of patches works ok for him.
> (Arun is the first user of this functionality after me.)
I'm
Em Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:03:31PM +0300, Andrew Vagin escreveu:
> It's opposition of perf_session__parse_sample.
>
> v2: fixed mistakes which David Arhen found
Ok, I'm taking this one, David, can I added an 'Acked-by: you"? Or even
"reviewed-by:" ?
I'm just changing 'data' to 'sample', data is
Em Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 12:19:42PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:03:31PM +0300, Andrew Vagin escreveu:
> > It's opposition of perf_session__parse_sample.
> >
> > v2: fixed mistakes which David Arhen found
>
> Ok, I'm taking this one, David, can I added an
Em Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:03:30PM +0300, Andrew Vagin escreveu:
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c |5 +
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
This patch doesn't apply in current tip/perf/core as this logic was
moved to perf_evsel/perf_evlist,
2011/12/5 Glauber Costa :
> Hi,
>
> Specially Peter and Paul, but all the others:
>
> As you can see in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/12/4/178, and in my answer to
> that, there is a question - one I've asked before but without that much of
> an audience - of whether /proc files read from process livi
Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
This patch makes svc_xprt inherit network namespace link from it's socket.
Should be "its socket."
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Stanislav Kinsbursky
wrote:
> 29.11.2011 16:40, tao.p...@emc.com пишет:
>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Stanislav Kinsbursky [mailto:skinsbur...@parallels.com]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 8:19 PM
>>> To: Peng, Tao
>>> Cc: trond.mykleb...@netapp.
Em Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:03:29PM +0300, Andrew Vagin escreveu:
> perf_evsel.name may be not initialized
I'm applying this one to my perf/urgent branch and will ask Ingo to
merge it today.
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Vagin
> ---
> tools/perf/util/header.c |2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertion
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Myklebust, Trond
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: tao.p...@emc.com [mailto:tao.p...@emc.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 7:40 AM
>> To: skinsbur...@parallels.com
>> Cc: Myklebust, Trond; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; xe...@parallels.com;
>> ne...@
> -Original Message-
> From: linux-nfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-nfs-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Stanislav
> Kinsbursky
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 6:11 PM
> To: trond.mykleb...@netapp.com
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; xe...@parallels.com; ne...@suse.de;
> ne
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Trond Myklebust
wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 23:10 +0800, Peng Tao wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Myklebust, Trond
>> wrote:
>> >> -Original Message-
>> >> From: tao.p...@emc.com [mailto:tao.p...@emc.com]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 20
Em Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 07:57:38AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> Ditto on that comment.
>
> I did not test it, but the logic is in the inverse of parse_sample so it
> should be correct.
>
> Arnaldo: you could use remove the 2 comment lines on the commit since
> there are no logic impacts.
>
> R
Em Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:43:35AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven escreveu:
> > perf_evlist is what you call perf_bundle and perf_evsel is what you call
> > perf_event in powertop.
> > That part of the API should be ok for wider use and is in fact exported
> > in the python binding.
>
> I don't care abo
Em Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 06:02:27AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven escreveu:
> On 11/28/2011 3:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 12:03 +0300, Andrew Vagin wrote:
> >> This tracepoint shows how long a task is sleeping in uninterruptible state.
> >> E.g.
> >> It may show how long and wh
On 12/16/2011 04:32 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Thu 15-12-11 16:29:18, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 12/14/2011 09:04 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
[Now with the current patch version, I hope]
On Mon 12-12-11 11:47:01, Glauber Costa wrote:
[...]
@@ -3848,10 +3862,17 @@ static inline u64 mem_cgroup_usage(s
Turns out that most of the infrastructure we need to put two controllers in the
same hierarchy is by far already into place. All we need to do is not failing
when we specify two of them.
With this, we can effectively guarantee that by comounting cpu and cpuacct,
we'll have the same set of tasks, t
40 matches
Mail list logo
