Re: [Devel] [PATCH 0/2] fuse: fix signals handling while processing request

2016-10-17 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
17 окт. 2016 г. 19:23 пользователь Maxim Patlasov написал: > > Stas, > > > Now, when we fully understand the patch, will you fix description of > 98cbcb14d? Yes, I"sent the update to Konstantin already. Thanks a lot again. The following does not seem correct: > > > >

Re: [Devel] [PATCH 0/2] fuse: fix signals handling while processing request

2016-10-17 Thread Maxim Patlasov
Stas, Now, when we fully understand the patch, will you fix description of 98cbcb14d? The following does not seem correct: >IOW, any signal, arrived to the process, which does page fault handling on fuse >file, _before_ request_wait_answer() is called, will lead to request >

Re: [Devel] [PATCH 2/2] fuse: handle only fatal signals while waiting request answer

2016-10-17 Thread Konstantin Khorenko
On 10/17/2016 03:01 PM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: Kostya, please, modify patch comment with the following substitution: s/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag, if processes is traced/ g done, thank you. Thanks. 13.10.2016 12:03, Stanislav

Re: [Devel] [PATCH 2/2] fuse: handle only fatal signals while waiting request answer

2016-10-17 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
Kostya, please, modify patch comment with the following substitution: s/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag, if processes is traced/ g Thanks. 13.10.2016 12:03, Stanislav Kinsburskiy пишет: This patch is backport of

Re: [Devel] [PATCH 0/2] fuse: fix signals handling while processing request

2016-10-17 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
16.10.2016 05:21, Maxim Patlasov пишет: Stas, On 10/14/2016 03:30 AM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: 14.10.2016 02:23, Maxim Patlasov пишет: Stas, The series look fine, so: Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It

Re: [Devel] [PATCH] ext4: fix mkdir operations with overlayfs

2016-10-17 Thread Vladimir Meshkov
Konstantin, thank you! On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Konstantin Khorenko < khore...@virtuozzo.com> wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > On 10/17/2016 11:48 AM, Vladimir Meshkov wrote: > >> Could you please clarify why we cannot find the commit at >>

Re: [Devel] [PATCH] ext4: fix mkdir operations with overlayfs

2016-10-17 Thread Konstantin Khorenko
Hi Vladimir, On 10/17/2016 11:48 AM, Vladimir Meshkov wrote: Could you please clarify why we cannot find the commit at https://src.openvz.org/projects/OVZ/repos/vzkernel/browse/fs/ext4/namei.c?at=refs/heads/branch-rh7-3.10.0-327.36.1.vz7.18.x-ovz ? Thank you. It will appear in the branch

Re: [Devel] [PATCH] ext4: fix mkdir operations with overlayfs

2016-10-17 Thread Vladimir Meshkov
and the commit exists at https://src.openvz.org/projects/OVZ/repos/vzkernel/browse/fs/ext4/namei.c?at=refs%2Fheads%2Fbranch-rh7-3.10.0-327.28.2.vz7.17.x-ovz . Could it be lost? On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Vladimir Meshkov wrote: > Could you please clarify why we

Re: [Devel] [PATCH] ext4: fix mkdir operations with overlayfs

2016-10-17 Thread Vladimir Meshkov
Could you please clarify why we cannot find the commit at https://src.openvz.org/projects/OVZ/repos/vzkernel/browse/fs/ext4/namei.c?at=refs/heads/branch-rh7-3.10.0-327.36.1.vz7.18.x-ovz ? Thank you. On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Maxim Patlasov wrote: > Thanks! You

[Devel] [PATCH] kernel: add kcov code coverage

2016-10-17 Thread Igor Redko
From: Dmitry Vyukov commit 5c9a8750a6409c63a0f01d51a9024861022f6593 upstream kcov provides code coverage collection for coverage-guided fuzzing (randomized testing). Coverage-guided fuzzing is a testing technique that uses coverage feedback to determine new interesting