Re: [Devel] [PATCH] scsi/eh: fix hang adding ehandler wakeups after decrementing host_busy

2017-11-09 Thread Pavel Tikhomirov
> Are there any issues with this patch (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9938919/) that Pavel Tikhomirov submitted back in September? I am willing to help if there's anything I can do to help get it accepted. Hi, Stuart, I asked James Bottomley about the patch status offlist and it seems

[Devel] [PATCH RHEL7 COMMIT] nfs: protect callback execution against per-net callback thread shutdown

2017-11-09 Thread Konstantin Khorenko
The commit is pushed to "branch-rh7-3.10.0-693.1.1.vz7.37.x-ovz" and will appear at https://src.openvz.org/scm/ovz/vzkernel.git after rh7-3.10.0-693.1.1.vz7.37.25 --> commit 2149800a70af636b2b22289fc5aa977420b392c2 Author: Stanislav Kinsburskiy Date: Thu Nov 9

[Devel] [PATCH RHEL7 COMMIT] sunrpc: bc_svc_flush_queue_net() helper introduced

2017-11-09 Thread Konstantin Khorenko
The commit is pushed to "branch-rh7-3.10.0-693.1.1.vz7.37.x-ovz" and will appear at https://src.openvz.org/scm/ovz/vzkernel.git after rh7-3.10.0-693.1.1.vz7.37.25 --> commit 99bfffc43ae40204d445f2c138071176d3e7b03d Author: Stanislav Kinsburskiy Date: Thu Nov 9

[Devel] [PATCH] mm: Kill allocate_vma() and free_vma()

2017-11-09 Thread Kirill Tkhai
Currently they are noops and just introduce unnecessary changes in "Initial patch". Kill them. Please, merge this to "Initial patch" on rebase. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai --- fs/exec.c |4 ++-- include/linux/mm.h |4 +--- kernel/fork.c |8

Re: [Devel] [PATCH v5 0/2] nfs: fix race between callback shutdown and execution

2017-11-09 Thread Kirill Tkhai
On 08.11.2017 20:23, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: > The idea is to use mutex for protecting callback execution agains per-net > callback shutdown and destroying all the net-related backchannel requests > before transports destruction. > > > --- > > Stanislav Kinsburskiy (2): > sunrpc:

Re: [Devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] nfs: protect callback execution against per-net callback thread shutdown

2017-11-09 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
09.11.2017 10:33, Kirill Tkhai пишет: > > Looks good for me, except there is one more call of nfs_callback_down_net() > in nfs_callback_up(). > It's not clear for me, we shouldn't protect it via the mutex too. Should we? > Looks like no, mount is not ready yet and there is no connection to

Re: [Devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] nfs: protect callback execution against per-net callback thread shutdown

2017-11-09 Thread Kirill Tkhai
On 08.11.2017 20:23, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: > From: Stanislav Kinsburskiy > > Here is the race: > > CPU #0CPU#1 > > cleanup_mnt nfs41_callback_svc (get xprt from the list) > nfs_callback_down ... >