From: Taesoo Kim
When 'jh->b_transaction == transaction' (asserted by below)
J_ASSERT_JH(jh, (jh->b_transaction == transaction || ...
'journal->j_list_lock' will be incorrectly unlocked, since
the the lock is aquired only at the end of if / else-if
statements (missing the else case).
Signed-
From: OGAWA Hirofumi
On umount path, jbd2_journal_destroy() writes latest transaction ID
(->j_tail_sequence) to be used at next mount.
The bug is that ->j_tail_sequence is not holding latest transaction ID
in some cases. So, at next mount, there is chance to conflict with
remaining (not overwrit
Hi, guys!
We've found a couple important fixes for jbd2 in the vanilla kernel,
please apply them to OVZ kernel
Taesoo Kim (1):
jbd2: fix incorrect unlock on j_list_lock
fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
OGAWA Hirofumi (1):
jbd2: fix FS corruptio
) iteration.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
---
net/core/sock.c | 30 --
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 763
This is a backport of upstream (vanilla) change.
Original commit: ed98df3361f059db42786c830ea96e2d18b8d4db
sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
Problem is that under mem
c Dumazet
Cc: Chris Mason
Cc: Debabrata Banerjee
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
[ luis: backported to 3.16: used davem's backport to 3.14 ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
---
net/core/sock.c | 9 +
This patch set aims to improve high-order allocations in
networking subsystem by reducing the impact on buddy allocator.
This is a carbon-copy of the recent patch set, i've just
set "Subject" field properly.
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
Anatoly Stepanov (3):
net: core: us
allocate contiguous
area, and fallback to vmalloc() as soon as possible.
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
---
fs/file.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
index 366d9bb..3f65ba0 100644
--- a/fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/file.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ sta
This patch set aims to improve high-order allocations in
networking subsystem by reducing the impact on buddy allocator.
This is a carbon-copy of the recent patch set, i've just
set "Subject" field properly.
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
Anatoly Stepanov (3):
net: core: us
) iteration.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
---
net/core/sock.c | 30 --
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 763
This is a backport of upstream (vanilla) change.
Original commit: ed98df3361f059db42786c830ea96e2d18b8d4db
sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
Problem is that under mem
c Dumazet
Cc: Chris Mason
Cc: Debabrata Banerjee
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
[ luis: backported to 3.16: used davem's backport to 3.14 ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
---
net/core/sock.c | 9 +
) iteration.
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet
Acked-by: David Rientjes
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
---
net/core/sock.c | 30 --
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index 763
This patch set aims to improve high-order allocations in
networking subsystem by reducing the impact on buddy allocator.
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
Anatoly Stepanov (3):
net: core: use __GFP_NORETRY for high order allocations
net: core: use atomic high-order allocations
net: core
c Dumazet
Cc: Chris Mason
Cc: Debabrata Banerjee
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller
[ luis: backported to 3.16: used davem's backport to 3.14 ]
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques
Signed-off-by: Anatoly Stepanov
---
net/core/sock.c | 9 +
This is a backport of upstream (vanilla) change.
Original commit: ed98df3361f059db42786c830ea96e2d18b8d4db
sock_alloc_send_pskb() & sk_page_frag_refill()
have a loop trying high order allocations to prepare
skb with low number of fragments as this increases performance.
Problem is that under mem
ould you please
>
> - file a bug to bugzilla.openvz.org
>
> - upload the vmcore at
>rsync://fe.sw.ru/f837d67c8e2ade8cee3367cb0f880268/
>
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 09:24:33AM +0300, Anatoly Stepanov wrote:
>> Hello everyone!
>>
>> We encounter an issue with me
Hello everyone!
We encounter an issue with mem_cgroup_uncharge_page() function,
it appears quite often on our clients servers.
Basically the issue sometimes leads to hard-lockup, sometimes to GP fault.
Based on bug reports from clients, the problem shows up when a user
process calls "execve" or
18 matches
Mail list logo
