This patch fixes wrong SIGBUS result in page fault handler for fuse file, when
process received a signal.
https://jira.sw.ru/browse/PSBM-53581
---
Stanislav Kinsburskiy (2):
new helper: wait_event_killable_exclusive()
fuse: handle only fatal signals while waiting request answer
fs
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must explain
clearly why the patch fixes the problem:
block_sigs() blocks ordinary non-fatal signals as expected, but
surprisingly SIGTRAP is special: it does not matter w
14.10.2016 02:23, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must
explain clearly why the patch fixes the problem:
block_sigs() blocks ordinary non-fatal signals as expected, but
surprising
Stas,
On 10/14/2016 03:30 AM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
14.10.2016 02:23, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must
explain clearly why the patch fixes the problem:
block_sigs()
16.10.2016 05:21, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
On 10/14/2016 03:30 AM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote:
14.10.2016 02:23, Maxim Patlasov пишет:
Stas,
The series look fine, so:
Acked-by: Maxim Patlasov
But, please, refine the description of the second patch. It must
explain clearly why
Stas,
Now, when we fully understand the patch, will you fix description of
98cbcb14d? The following does not seem correct:
>IOW, any signal, arrived to the process, which does page fault
handling on fuse
>file, _before_ request_wait_answer() is called, will lead to request
>int
17 окт. 2016 г. 19:23 пользователь Maxim Patlasov
написал:
>
> Stas,
>
>
> Now, when we fully understand the patch, will you fix description of
> 98cbcb14d?
Yes, I"sent the update to Konstantin already.
Thanks a lot again.
The following does not seem correct:
>
>
> >IOW, any signal, arrive
