Re: [Devel] [PATCH 2/2] fuse: handle only fatal signals while waiting request answer

2016-10-17 Thread Konstantin Khorenko
On 10/17/2016 03:01 PM, Stanislav Kinsburskiy wrote: Kostya, please, modify patch comment with the following substitution: s/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag, if processes is traced/ g done, thank you. Thanks. 13.10.2016 12:03, Stanislav

Re: [Devel] [PATCH 2/2] fuse: handle only fatal signals while waiting request answer

2016-10-17 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
Kostya, please, modify patch comment with the following substitution: s/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag/ it doesn't drop pending signal flag, if processes is traced/ g Thanks. 13.10.2016 12:03, Stanislav Kinsburskiy пишет: This patch is backport of

[Devel] [PATCH 2/2] fuse: handle only fatal signals while waiting request answer

2016-10-13 Thread Stanislav Kinsburskiy
This patch is backport of 7d3a07fcb8a0d5c06718de14fb91fdf1ef20a0e2 commit. Although this commit loks more like cleanup, it's not. It fixes the issue with signals, which can lead to abort of page read in fuse, called from page fault, immediatly leading to SIGBUS sent to the caller. The issue is in