On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 03:29:15PM -0800, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > This action must never fail I think. If it does -- we need
> > to investigate carefully why :/ I simply don't see another
> > option at the moment, but I'm open for ideas.
>
> Why can we not use POST_RESTORE?
opst-restore is too
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 12:01:20AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:37:18PM -0800, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:05:37AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > > The main idea is to be able to operate with container
> > > at the moment where its processess
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:37:18PM -0800, Andrey Vagin wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:05:37AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > The main idea is to be able to operate with container
> > at the moment where its processess and resources are
> > already restored but the processes are not yet in
On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:05:37AM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> The main idea is to be able to operate with container
> at the moment where its processess and resources are
> already restored but the processes are not yet in
> running state, ie just before we kick them.
>
> Beside the need of
The main idea is to be able to operate with container
at the moment where its processess and resources are
already restored but the processes are not yet in
running state, ie just before we kick them.
Beside the need of tuning up beancounters (which is vz7
specific feature) this might be useful
