On Mon, 2007-07-09 at 11:16 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 22:20 -0700, Balbir Singh wrote:
> >> +/*
> >> + * the core object. the container that wishes to account for some
> >> + * resource may include this counter into its structures and use
> >> + *
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 22:20 -0700, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * the core object. the container that wishes to account for some
>> + * resource may include this counter into its structures and use
>> + * the helpers described beyond
>> + */
>
> I'm going to nitpick a bit h
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 14:03 -0700, Balbir Singh wrote:
+ssize_t res_counter_read(struct res_counter *cnt, int member,
+const char __user *userbuf, size_t nbytes, loff_t
>> *pos)
+{
+unsigned long *val;
+char buf[64], *s;
+
Dave Hansen wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 22:20 -0700, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * the core object. the container that wishes to account for some
>> + * resource may include this counter into its structures and use
>> + * the helpers described beyond
>> + */
>
> I'm going to nitpick a bit h
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 14:03 -0700, Balbir Singh wrote:
>
> >> +ssize_t res_counter_read(struct res_counter *cnt, int member,
> >> +const char __user *userbuf, size_t nbytes, loff_t
> *pos)
> >> +{
> >> +unsigned long *val;
> >> +char buf[64], *s;
> >> +
> >> +s = buf;
> >>
On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 22:20 -0700, Balbir Singh wrote:
> +/*
> + * the core object. the container that wishes to account for some
> + * resource may include this counter into its structures and use
> + * the helpers described beyond
> + */
I'm going to nitpick a bit here. Nothing major, I promise
