Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Subrata,
pty namespaces as such are not going to happen. We'll be pursuing
full-scale device namespaces instead.
Again, either that, or tie Unix98 pty's closer into devpts (which would
have other advantages, in particular avoiding the double lookup) which
would
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Veerendra Chandrappa wrote:
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them with the LTP.
Of course it depends on the order of priority, and as I am learning the
tricks of container/ltp
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 07:25 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Veerendra Chandrappa wrote:
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them with the LTP.
Of course it depends on the order of priority, and as I am learning the
tricks of container/ltp .
Regards, Veerendra C
Linux Technology Center, India Software Labs,
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 18:01 +0530, Veerendra Chandrappa wrote:
Hi Sukadev,
That sounds nice, I will integrate them with the LTP.
Of course it depends on the order of priority, and as I am learning the
tricks of container/ltp .
That is cool Veerandra. Now, for this to move forward,
