On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:08:03AM +0200, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:55:18PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Ok, again, after all of this, who is going to be app
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:09:09PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Wonderful, can I get some acks from the cgroups maintainers? I'll
> > gladly take it through my tree.
>
> Sure.
>
> Acked-by: Paul Menage
Wonderful, now queued up.
greg k-h
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Wonderful, can I get some acks from the cgroups maintainers? I'll
> gladly take it through my tree.
Sure.
Acked-by: Paul Menage
Paul
___
Containers mailing list
contain...@lists.linux-foundation.or
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:55:18PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> >
>> > Ok, again, after all of this, who is going to be applying this patch to
>> > their tree for the .36 merge window?
>>
>> Ther
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:55:18PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Ok, again, after all of this, who is going to be applying this patch to
> > their tree for the .36 merge window?
>
> There's no specific cgroups tree - cgroups patches generally
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Ok, again, after all of this, who is going to be applying this patch to
> their tree for the .36 merge window?
There's no specific cgroups tree - cgroups patches generally go via akpm.
>
> Or should I apply it to my driver-core one?
>
That sou
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:13:14AM +0200, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:08, Dhaval Giani
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:08, Dhaval Giani wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> We really sh
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:08, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>>> > We really shouldn't be asking userspace to create new root filesystems.
* Vivek Goyal [2010-07-22 17:26:34]:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:37:41PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> >
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:10:43AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:48, Matt Helsley wrote:
> > So I'd suggest
> > those cgroup mounts go in /var/run/systemd/cgroup or something like that.
>
> Impossible, we need it at bootup, and / is usually read-only, and /var
> might eve
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:32:26PM +0200, Jan Safranek wrote:
> On 07/23/2010 04:07 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:14:01PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH wrote:
>> For my t
On 07/23/2010 04:07 AM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:14:01PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH wrote:
> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it
>>>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:14:01PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH wrote:
> > >> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it
> > >> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount c
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 05:26:34PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:37:41PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, P
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 04:12:58PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Any suggestions from your side?
> >
>
> I'd probably go with Matt's suggestion of /var/run.
See Kay's answer for why this will not work.
sorry,
greg k-h
__
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 16:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH wrote:
> > >> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it
> > >> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount controll
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:14 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Ah, that makes it easier. Paul and Vivek, any objection to this patch
> going in now?
>
Sounds reasonable.
Paul
___
Containers mailing list
contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-f
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 01:08:12AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH wrote:
> >> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it
> >> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount controllers on respective
> >> directories.
> >
> > Lennart and Ka
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Any suggestions from your side?
>
I'd probably go with Matt's suggestion of /var/run.
Paul
___
Containers mailing list
contain...@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:48, Matt Helsley wrote:
> So I'd suggest
> those cgroup mounts go in /var/run/systemd/cgroup or something like that.
Impossible, we need it at bootup, and / is usually read-only, and /var
might even be behind the network we need to bring up.
It needs to be on tmpfs mou
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 23:18, Greg KH wrote:
>> For my testing I now always use /cgroup/ and create directories under it
>> /cgroup/blkio /cgroup/cpu etc and mount controllers on respective
>> directories.
>
> Lennart and Kay, is this what systemd is doing? I really don't think we
> should be ad
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:12:00PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:07:43PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > >
> > > If you are using /dev/cgroup/ that's nice, but I don't think that people
> > > are expecting a whole filesystem u
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:18:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:37:41PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:18:13PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> > I don't know if we want to encourage that as a mount point, do you?
>
> No.
Heh.
> > What are the different names you are giving to your mount points now for
> > cgroupfs so I can
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 03:37:41PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > We really shouldn't be asking userspace to create
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36:15AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > We really shouldn't be asking userspace to create new root filesystems.
> > > So follow along with all of the other in-
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> I don't know if we want to encourage that as a mount point, do you?
No.
>
> What are the different names you are giving to your mount points now for
> cgroupfs so I can get an idea of how it is used currently?
>
We don't particularly care about
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> If you are using /dev/cgroup/ that's nice, but I don't think that people
> are expecting a whole filesystem under a /dev/ subdirectory.
Sure - as I said that's just for historical reasons from when we
migrated from cpusets which were traditiona
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 12:07:43PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > If you are using /dev/cgroup/ that's nice, but I don't think that people
> > are expecting a whole filesystem under a /dev/ subdirectory.
>
> Sure - as I said that's just for hi
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:44:50AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Really? I see systems mounting it at /cgroups/ in the filesystem today.
>
> Sure, it *can* be mounted as a single instance, but you then lose
> flexibility. E.g. at Google we w
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Really? I see systems mounting it at /cgroups/ in the filesystem today.
Sure, it *can* be mounted as a single instance, but you then lose
flexibility. E.g. at Google we want to have a different hierarchy for
the CPU subsystem (with the tree gr
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:31:07AM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > We really shouldn't be asking userspace to create new root filesystems.
> > So follow along with all of the other in-kernel filesystems, and provide
> > a mount point in sysfs.
> >
>
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> We really shouldn't be asking userspace to create new root filesystems.
> So follow along with all of the other in-kernel filesystems, and provide
> a mount point in sysfs.
>
> For cgroupfs, this should be in /sys/fs/cgroup/ This change provides
34 matches
Mail list logo
