On 09/07/2010 11:22 PM, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>> The clone_children option behaves like the release-agent mount option no ?
>>
> Not quite, since it can be controlled on a per-cgroup basis.
>
>
>> We can mount with a specific rel
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:13 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
> The clone_children option behaves like the release-agent mount option no ?
Not quite, since it can be controlled on a per-cgroup basis.
> We can mount with a specific release agent and change it at runtime. IMHO it
> would be better to gi
On 09/07/2010 10:26 PM, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>
>>> This bit is awkward - you're storing the original value of the
>>> clone_children flag to report in the mount options, but this isn't
>>> necessarily the current state. Might it be better t
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> This bit is awkward - you're storing the original value of the
>> clone_children flag to report in the mount options, but this isn't
>> necessarily the current state. Might it be better to not store this
>> and just report the current value
On 09/07/2010 09:34 PM, Paul Menage wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Daniel Lezcano
> wrote:
>
>> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ inline int cgroup_is_removed(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
>> /* bits in struct cgroupfs_root flags field */
>> enum {
>> ROOT_NOPREFIX, /* mounted subsystem
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> @@ -229,6 +229,7 @@ inline int cgroup_is_removed(const struct cgroup *cgrp)
> /* bits in struct cgroupfs_root flags field */
> enum {
> ROOT_NOPREFIX, /* mounted subsystems have no named prefix */
> + ROOT_CLONE_CHILDREN, /* m
Cc: Andrew Morton (to pick up those patches)
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> This patch is sent as an answer to a previous thread around the ns_cgroup.
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/containers/2009-June/018627.html
>
> It adds a control file 'clone_children' for a cgroup.
> This cont
