[Devel] Re: Pid namespace patchsets review

2007-03-11 Thread Eric W. Biederman
"Serge E. Hallyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If we're going to put the resource stuff in, then I agree let's rename. > If we stick to this being a namespace proxy (my preference) then calling > it nsproxy is more accurate. Sounds like a reasonable criteria. > (I can't keep up with that thread

[Devel] Re: Pid namespace patchsets review

2007-03-11 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 06:57:13PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > IMHO not the best idea, mainly because both OpenVZ > > and Linux-VServer will end up either duplicating > > the pid code or using the incomplete (broken) version > > which probabl

[Devel] Re: Pid namespace patchsets review

2007-03-11 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > It is good to see these patches are starting to come together. > > Be patient a good review is going to take me a little bit. > > A couple of immediate things I see that would be nice to address before > we aim at merging these patches upstream.

[Devel] Re: Pid namespace patchsets review

2007-03-10 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Herbert Poetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > IMHO not the best idea, mainly because both OpenVZ > and Linux-VServer will end up either duplicating > the pid code or using the incomplete (broken) version > which probably gives the pid space a bad start ... > > I'd prefer to focus on fixing up the

[Devel] Re: Pid namespace patchsets review

2007-03-10 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:05:43PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > It is good to see these patches are starting to come together. > > Be patient a good review is going to take me a little bit. > > A couple of immediate things I see that would be nice to address before > we aim at merging the

[Devel] Re: Pid namespace patchsets review

2007-03-10 Thread sukadev
Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | | It is good to see these patches are starting to come together. | | Be patient a good review is going to take me a little bit. Ok. | | A couple of immediate things I see that would be nice to address before | we aim at merging these patches upstream

[Devel] Re: Pid namespace patchsets review

2007-03-09 Thread Eric W. Biederman
It is good to see these patches are starting to come together. Be patient a good review is going to take me a little bit. A couple of immediate things I see that would be nice to address before we aim at merging these patches upstream. - Since there are known cases that we still need to convert