[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-19 Thread Balbir Singh
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Dwight Schauer wrote: > > I'm starting to get is quite regularly, but not every time: > > lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup > '/cgroup/CONTAINER_NAME' > Can you please paste the output of cat /proc/cgroups and cat /proc/mounts >

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > tasks is empty, but there are subdirectories - 102, 26533, etc. > > This looks like the dirtywork of the ns cgroup.  If each of those > > subdirs is also empty then you can rmdir them, then rm

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 7:24 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > tasks is empty, but there are subdirectories - 102, 26533, etc. > This looks like the dirtywork of the ns cgroup.  If each of those > subdirs is also empty then you can rmdir them, then rmdir /cgroup/arch64-1. > > Or, use a release agent, wh

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): > >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano > >> wrote: > >> > Did you check the file /cgroup//tasks is empty ? it's probably a > >> >

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): >> On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano >> wrote: >> > Did you check the file /cgroup//tasks is empty ? it's probably a dumb >> > question, but just in case :) >> > >> >> Ok, since th

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Dwight Schauer (dscha...@gmail.com): > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > Did you check the file /cgroup//tasks is empty ? it's probably a dumb > > question, but just in case :) > > > > Ok, since this is easy enough to reproduce, I got it into this state again. > >

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Balbir Singh
> munmap(0x7feca822, 4096)            = 0 > access("/cgroup/arch64-1", F_OK)        = 0 > rmdir("/cgroup/arch64-1")               = -1 EBUSY (Device or resource busy) > write(2, "lxc-start: "..., 11lxc-start: )          = 11 > write(2, "Device or resource busy - failed "..., 77Device or resourc

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-04 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 4:40 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > Did you check the file /cgroup//tasks is empty ? it's probably a dumb > question, but just in case :) > Ok, since this is easy enough to reproduce, I got it into this state again. $ cat /cgroup/arch64-1/tasks $ it is empty > Can you give

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-03 Thread Dwight Schauer
# strace lxc-start -n arch64-1 /root/boot-init.sh execve("/usr/bin/lxc-start", ["lxc-start", "-n", "arch64-1", "/root/boot-init.sh"], [/* 21 vars */]) = 0 brk(0) = 0x1bf9000 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7feca8223000 ac

[Devel] Re: lxc-start: Device or resource busy - failed to remove previous cgroup

2010-01-03 Thread Dwight Schauer
On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Balbir Singh wrote: > Can you please paste the output of cat /proc/cgroups and cat /proc/mounts Sure. > This should not really happen, /proc/cgroups will help us figure out what > is going on. As an alternative, if you can compile the debug cgroup container, > you'