Re: [ovirt-devel] GWT-Platform MVP tech session - anyone interested?

Yes please. - Original Message - > From: "Vojtech Szocs" > To: devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 9:13:17 PM > Subject: [ovirt-devel] GWT-Platform MVP tech session - anyone interested? > > Hi guys, > > few days ago, I gave my ancient (Dec 2011!) GWT-Platform [1] > Model-V

[ovirt-devel] GWT-Platform MVP tech session - anyone interested?

Hi guys, few days ago, I gave my ancient (Dec 2011!) GWT-Platform [1] Model-View-Presenter tech session to a couple of colleagues so that they better understand our frontend infra/structure. [1] https://github.com/ArcBees/GWTP This session was meant to explain the core concepts of GWTP framework

[ovirt-devel] Meeting with Mark to discuss UberFire project

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Europe/Belgrade BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;WKST=MO;INTERVAL=1;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU TZNAME:CET END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:160101

Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization

Hi Mark, sorry for late response. I've looked at GWTP -> UberFire migration presentation, looks interesting. It will be best if we discuss everything next week, I'll schedule a meeting on Monday (Nov 10) and also share it on devel-list for anyone interested to participate. @other, if you're inte

Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization

Hi, I can summarized that you want again to go into the "Java way" and not the "Simple/primitive way". I think it is a mistake and will not have any benefit, "API" can be a wrapper over primitive interaction. We were there at past discussions, and as there is no leader of project we can discuss

[ovirt-devel] Error building engine on FC21

[INFO] [INFO] Building builtin-extensions 3.5.1-SNAPSHOT [INFO] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-resources-plugin:2.4.3:resources (default-resources) @ builtin -

Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization

- Original Message - > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" > Cc: "Vojtech Szocs" , "Mark Proctor" > , devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 9:40:05 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Alon B

Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization

- Original Message - > From: "Yair Zaslavsky" > To: "Sven Kieske" > Cc: devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 9:34:20 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Sven Kieske" > > To: devel@ovirt.org > > Sen

Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization

- Original Message - > From: "Sven Kieske" > To: devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:36:39 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization > > > > On 05/11/14 17:07, Vojtech Szocs wrote: > > This way, you'd have one "core" module, providing most general >

Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization

- Original Message - > From: "Alon Bar-Lev" > To: "Vojtech Szocs" > Cc: devel@ovirt.org, "Mark Proctor" > Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 5:16:15 PM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Thoughts on modularization > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Vojtech Szocs" > > To: "Alo

[ovirt-devel] removed some "marked" fields from instance type

Hi all, as you may know, a subpart of the instance type entity (the "marked" column from [1]) are the ones which are marked with the chain icon in the VM dialogs. The meaning is that this fields are so important that if you want the newly created VM to be based on that instance type, you can not