Hi,
a recent change introduced a dependency on python-blivet = 0.61.14 which is
not available at least on Fedora 20
Please provide the required package or ask fedora maintainer to backport to
Fedora 20.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=15389
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better
On 03/19/2015 01:05 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:39:45PM +0200, Sahina Bose wrote:
On 03/17/2015 11:12 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 06:02:36PM +0200, Sahina Bose wrote:
On 03/16/2015 03:28 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
Current master branch of vdsm
On Mar 19, 2015, at 10:31 , Itamar Heim ih...@redhat.com wrote:
On 03/19/2015 01:05 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 09:39:45PM +0200, Sahina Bose wrote:
On 03/17/2015 11:12 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 06:02:36PM +0200, Sahina Bose wrote:
On
On 03/19/2015 02:17 PM, Timothy Asir Jeyasingh wrote:
Blivet returns the unit size as an object (blivet.size) in blivet version =
0.61.14 which is available in F21. We thought that using size object will be more
clearer; because it provides unit type and some more functionality to change from
Il 19/03/2015 12:08, Francesco Romani ha scritto:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Kenigsberg dan...@redhat.com
To: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com, Timothy Asir
tjeya...@redhat.com, Bala.FA barum...@redhat.com
Cc: devel@ovirt.org
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:06:22 PM
Hey,
lately I've updated the oVirt Engine appliance image to be based on CentOS 7,
to get away from breakage which came from the fast moving forward Fedora
(previously
the appliance was based on Fedora).
Besides of that I've simplified the kickstart and Tolik added support for
cloud-init,
which
Patch sent to upstream: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/38942/
I will test it in F20 and F21 and verify the patch by today.
Regards,
Tim
- Original Message -
From: ybronhei ybron...@redhat.com
To: Timothy Asir Jeyasingh tjeya...@redhat.com, Sandro Bonazzola
sbona...@redhat.com
Cc:
Hi all,
I post a conversation with Eli regarding vm icons (and screenhots) there to
find wide agreement on database layout. Requirements are summarized in
conversation below.
Based on discussion with Eli and later with Tomas and Michal the current
proposal corresponds to option (3) at
