Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] Profiling results - 144 cores, 144 vms

- Original Message - > From: "Nir Soffer" > To: "devel" , "Francesco Romani" , > "Eldad Marciano" , > "Vinzenz Feenstra" , "Dan Kenigsberg" > , "Piotr Kliczewski" >

[ovirt-devel] [VDSM] Profiling results - 144 cores, 144 vms

Hi all, I noticed that Eldad posted profiling result from 144 cores / 144 vms run: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1128028 Looking at the profile bellow: 1. Why _rtnl_link_alloc_cache is so expensive? called only 389 times, but the most expensive call 2. Creating

Re: [ovirt-devel] IPv6 support in oVirt

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Yevgeny Zaspitsky wrote: > Piotr, > > According to our checks engine succeed connecting VDSM through ipv6 once the > work you've reminded has been done. So it looks like jsonrpc is agnostic to > IP layer it uses underneath. > I never tested

Re: [ovirt-devel] cpu profile permission error while editing/creating vm

Hi everyone, I've just uploaded a patch that fixes this problem. You no longer suppose to experience any difficulty creating/editing VMs. Sorry for the temporary inconvenience. FYI, Tomer - Original Message - From: "Jakub Niedermertl" To: "Greg Sheremeta"

Re: [ovirt-devel] IPv6 support in oVirt

Piotr, According to our checks engine succeed connecting VDSM through ipv6 once the work you've reminded has been done. So it looks like jsonrpc is agnostic to IP layer it uses underneath. Could you please elaborate on why do you think that we break backward compatibility. If you compare the

Re: [ovirt-devel] IPv6 support in oVirt

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:59:20AM -0500, Martin Perina wrote: > I think we have created a bug [1] for fencing related ipv6 support. > > Martin > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194055 > > - Original Message - > > From: "Eli Mesika" > > To:

Re: [ovirt-devel] IPv6 support in oVirt

I think we have created a bug [1] for fencing related ipv6 support. Martin [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194055 - Original Message - > From: "Eli Mesika" > To: "Yevgeny Zaspitsky" > Cc: "devel" , "Michael

Re: [ovirt-devel] IPv6 support in oVirt

This will require a change also in the fencing arguments We will have to add inet4_only inet6_only support from the UI/API as a common field (like port/slot/secure) See https://fedorahosted.org/cluster/wiki/FenceArguments Please add that as well to your doc. - Original Message - >

Re: [ovirt-devel] [vdsm][virt] what's new in virt (20160216)

On 16/02/16 15:35, Francesco Romani wrote: > * Francesco: the `convirt' module mostly (support containers with > libvirt API) plus cleanup Hi, I assume this is a self written module for ovirt/libvirt to manage containers? Is convirt the real name of it? Because there seems to be another open

Re: [ovirt-devel] IPv6 support in oVirt

Thank you for the effort. I have 2 comments: - In [1] I do not see any information about using ipv6 in jsonrpc code. I know that there was some work done on vdsm [2] side but nothing on the engine side. - We are about to break some backward compatibility so I suggest to define new type which