[ovirt-devel] Updated invitation: oVirt System Test Hackathon @ Tue Mar 13, 2018 (devel@ovirt.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20180313 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20180314 DTSTAMP:20180308T142116Z ORGANIZER;CN=sbona...@redhat.com:mailto:sbona...@redhat.com UID:08ne69mtqlj4rsf32331226...@goog

[ovirt-devel] Heads up: dropping fcraw jobs from jenkins

Following today call, I'm going to push a patch for dropping all rawhide jobs from jenkins. This should help avoiding distractions and reducing patches blocked by rawhide issues. -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA

[ovirt-devel] Invitation: oVirt System Test Hackathon @ Tue Mar 13, 2018 (devel@ovirt.org)

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN VERSION:2.0 CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:REQUEST BEGIN:VEVENT DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20180313 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20180314 DTSTAMP:20180308T130823Z ORGANIZER;CN=sbona...@redhat.com:mailto:sbona...@redhat.com UID:08ne69mtqlj4rsf32331226...@goog

Re: [ovirt-devel] he-basic-ansible-suite-master and he-basic-suite-master

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:49 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: > Isn't it enforcing the legacy flow already? I think it was last time I > tried. > It should: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/86398 > > Martin > > On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Sandro Bonazzola > wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm looking at diffs between

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt 4.2 (ovirt-hosted-engine-setup) ] [ 08-03-2018 ] [ 004_basic_sanity.run_vms ]

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:53 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: > Hi, > > We have a failed test on ovirt-hosted-engine-setup basic suite. > We failed to run a vm with internal engine error. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > *Link and headline of suspected patches: Add engine fqdn to inventory and > allow dy

Re: [ovirt-devel] he-basic-ansible-suite-master and he-basic-suite-master

Isn't it enforcing the legacy flow already? I think it was last time I tried. Martin On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking at diffs between he-basic-ansible-suite-master and > he-basic-suite-master in oVirt Sytem Test. Since we are now defaulting to > the a

[ovirt-devel] he-basic-ansible-suite-master and he-basic-suite-master

Hi, I'm looking at diffs between he-basic-ansible-suite-master and he-basic-suite-master in oVirt Sytem Test. Since we are now defaulting to the ansible deployment, aren't these 2 suites substantially testing the same flow? Can we drop one of them? Or should we change the non ansible suite to enfo

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt 4.2 (ovirt-hosted-engine-setup) ] [ 08-03-2018 ] [ 004_basic_sanity.run_vms ]

Does not seem to be hosted engine related.. there is no way we could cause internal engine error by using the API alone. Martin On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: > Hi, > > We have a failed test on ovirt-hosted-engine-setup basic suite. > We failed to run a vm with internal engine

[ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt 4.2 (ovirt-hosted-engine-setup) ] [ 08-03-2018 ] [ 004_basic_sanity.run_vms ]

Hi, We have a failed test on ovirt-hosted-engine-setup basic suite. We failed to run a vm with internal engine error.

Re: [ovirt-devel] [OST][HC] Failed to deploy HE

Hi Sahina, you need to synchronize couple of fixes to make everything work properly, most importantly - hosted engine setup https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/88311/ - vdsm https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/88370/ Those were all merged already (yesterday in fact), but it takes time to propagate them to the

[ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] fixing CI on FC27 and RAWHIDE

Hi to all maintainers, TL;DR: If you use yum-utils on fedora (For e.g using yum-builddep) you need to switch to dnf-utils. As you may know we had encountered many issues when trying to get CI to work well for FC27 and Fedora RAWHIDE. One of the main reasons for the issues we've seen was that we

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] Remove fcraw build as gating

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 9:51 AM, Edward Haas wrote: > Hi All, > > Fcraw build on VDSM check-patch has been failing recently (again). > > fcraw cannot act as gating to the VDSM CI, as it is unstable (by > definition). > If there is a strong interest for some to track VDSM against this unstable > di