[ovirt-devel] Re: Fwd: Orphaning my packages

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 1:20 PM Tal Nisan wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:39 PM Martin Perina wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, 16:33 Tal Nisan, wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 5:22 PM Sandro Bonazzola >>> wrote: >>> FYI, we consume those packages on Fedora.

[ovirt-devel] Re: Checkstyle Java 11 false positives.

> I think more correct usage is: > > Set attachmentsToRemove = new HashSet<>(); Well, for something that survives long enough yes. But `var` is a new Java 10 feature that is totally valid. See for example here: https://www.baeldung.com/java-10-local-variable-type-inference Martin On Mon, Oct 14

[ovirt-devel] Re: Proposing Andrej Krejcir as a maintainer of engine core

+1 from me. Martin On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 2:03 PM Arik Hadas wrote: > > Dear engine-core maintainers, > > I'd like to propose Andrej Krejcir as a maintainer of oVirt engine backend. > > Since Jul 2015, Andrej has been contributing to ovirt-engine, mostly in SLA > areas (scheduling, quota, etc)

[ovirt-devel] Re: ovirt-vdsmfake

sense to add a test using it for > scale? > > > >> >> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:34 AM Martin Sivak wrote: >> >>> Really? I was definitely using it last year for scheduling testing. >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019

[ovirt-devel] Re: ovirt-vdsmfake

Really? I was definitely using it last year for scheduling testing. Martin On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 3:30 PM Greg Sheremeta wrote: > It is abandoned, and hasn't worked in quite some time. Last commit was > 2017, and even in 2017 it wasn't always reliable so we stopped using it. > > Greg > > > On

[ovirt-devel] Re: ovirt-scheduler-proxy: subproject health check

://lists.ovirt.org/pipermail/users/2017-July/083232.html Best regards Martin Sivak On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 10:41 AM Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > Hi, > oVirt Scheduler Proxy has been introduced in oVirt 3.3.1 back in 2013. > Last update on master branch is dated November 2017 with 0.1.8 rel

[ovirt-devel] Re: Taking down the engine without setting global maintenance

g). Martin On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:04 AM Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:41 AM Simone Tiraboschi wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 10:34 AM Yedidyah Bar David wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 11:30 AM Mart

[ovirt-devel] Re: Taking down the engine without setting global maintenance

Hi, there is no way to distinguish an engine that is not responsive (software or network issue) from a VM that is being powered off. The shutdown takes some time during which you just do not know. Global maintenance informs the tooling in advance that something like this is going to happen. Who d

[ovirt-devel] Re: oVirt documentation vs. feature pages

Hi, > 2. Feature pages can and should be updated, and include inline the changes > done per version. This is very hard to enforce as feature pages are part of a different repository on a different review platform (!). Ideally this kind of (developer) documentation should be part of source code re

[ovirt-devel] Re: Proposing Fred Rolland as a Storage backend maintainer

+1 from me as well Martin On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Tal Nisan wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'd like to propose Fred as a backend maintainer in Engine for the storage > area. > Fred has been contributing to ovirt-engine for the last 3.5 years and have > done tremendous job in adding new featur

[ovirt-devel] Re: Proposing Shmuel Melamud as a Virt backend maintainer

+1 from me too On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 8:21 AM, Michal Skrivanek wrote: > Hi all, > I’d like to propose Shmuel as a backend maintainer for the virt area. He’s a > good candidate with his 200+ patches and insight into complex parts of VM > pools, templates, q35 support, v2v, sparsify... > Feel f

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt messages from engine to vdsm

Hi, that sure looks like postgresql SCL packages. Software collections are installed into /opt and need to be enabled using the `scl enable ` command to allow their usage. Best regards Martin Sivak On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya wrote: > rpm -qa |grep postgres &

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt messages from engine to vdsm

tions set option_value = 'false' WHERE option_name = 'SSLEnabled';" psql $ENGINE_DB -c "UPDATE vdc_options set option_value = 'false' WHERE option_name = 'EncryptHostCommunication';" So I must have done something differently at that time (the a

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt RPC messages

Hi, no, the traffic is not enough. All the information is present in the both audit log and engine log. You can even forward your audit log messages to email for example: https://www.ovirt.org/documentation/admin-guide/chap-Event_Notifications/ Best regards Martin Sivak On Mon, May 7, 2018 at

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt messages from engine to vdsm

://www.ovirt.org/blog/2016/11/testing-ovirt-changes-without-cluster/ Might I ask what you goal is? Best regards -- Martin Sivak SLA / oVirt On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 6:26 AM, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya wrote: > Hello everyone! > Currently I want to determine what information is included in me

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt RPC messages

Hi, we send a correlation id with the commands to be able to pair the engine.log commands with vdsm commands. I am pretty sure we do not send any user identification to the node. Best regards Martin Sivak On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 6:19 AM, Anastasiya Ruzhanskaya wrote: > Hello! > Do me

Re: [ovirt-devel] Name resolution not working after vdsm installation

IPv6 only DNS? Cool (if it works) :) Martin On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Piotr Kliczewski wrote: > In addition here is my resolv.conf > > ; generated by /usr/sbin/dhclient-script > nameserver 2001:730:3ed2::53 > nameserver 2001:730:3ed2:1000::53 > search localdomain > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018

Re: [ovirt-devel] Invitation: oVirt STDCI v2 deep dive @ Thu Apr 26, 2018 11:00 - 12:00 (IDT) (devel@ovirt.org)

gt;>> I would also recommend to send personal invitation to oVirt team leads >>> to be sure they see it. >>> >> >> Sure of you can give me a list... >> > > Sandro Bonazzola - Integration / Release Engineering > Ryan Barry - Node > Michal Skrivanek

Re: [ovirt-devel] he-basic-ansible-suite-master and he-basic-suite-master

Isn't it enforcing the legacy flow already? I think it was last time I tried. Martin On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:46 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Hi, > I'm looking at diffs between he-basic-ansible-suite-master and > he-basic-suite-master in oVirt Sytem Test. Since we are now defaulting to > the a

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ OST Failure Report ] [ oVirt 4.2 (ovirt-hosted-engine-setup) ] [ 08-03-2018 ] [ 004_basic_sanity.run_vms ]

Does not seem to be hosted engine related.. there is no way we could cause internal engine error by using the API alone. Martin On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Dafna Ron wrote: > Hi, > > We have a failed test on ovirt-hosted-engine-setup basic suite. > We failed to run a vm with internal engine

Re: [ovirt-devel] [OST][HC] Failed to deploy HE

the OST repos I guess. Best regards Martin Sivak On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 5:55 AM, Sahina Bose wrote: > Error is - The host has been set in non_operational status, please check > engine logs, fix accordingly and re-deploy. > > However there are no engine logs available. Is this erro

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION-REQUIRED] Making accurate CI for oVirt 4.2

Hi, > You`re asking a bigger question here - Who decides which distros/archs > each project targets. The CI system currently places the burden of > this decision on the shoulders of individual maintainers. We could > have done things differently and placed the decision solely in the > hands of the

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION-REQUIRED] Making accurate CI for oVirt 4.2

ak Korren wrote: > > On 23 January 2018 at 18:44, Martin Sivak wrote: > > Hi Barak, > > can you please please add links to the proper repositories and/or > directories when you send something like this? I really helps us when > we do not have to search through all the jenkins

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION-REQUIRED] Making accurate CI for oVirt 4.2

=tree;f=jobs/confs/projects;h=5a59dfea545da98e252eb6c8d95a92d08708a22d;hb=cd75bb9eb3353652384ed89777fc15d71d1f9e36 Best regards Martin Sivak On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Barak Korren wrote: > Hi, > > This message is aimed for project maintainers. Other developers may > also find it

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 GA Go / No go

I have my reservations, but perfect is the enemy of good. +1 Martin On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > 2017-12-19 15:21 GMT+01:00 Sandro Bonazzola : > >> Hi, >> we released 4.2.0 RC3 yesterday and currently we don't have approved or >> proposed blockers. >> So maint

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 GA status

PM, Piotr Kliczewski wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >>>> So I think that we still have to fix it somehow. >>>> Are we really sure that nr_retries=2 and _timeout=20 are really the magic >>>> numbers that works on every conditions?

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 GA status

There is no misuse when optional argument is not used. But hosted engine uses the timeout parameter anyway so you can assume it is not a blocker for us. Martin On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Martin Perina wrote: > As Irit mentioned the provided reproduction steps are wrong (misuse of the > c

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 GA status

>> So I think that we still have to fix it somehow. >> Are we really sure that nr_retries=2 and _timeout=20 are really the magic >> numbers that works on every conditions? > > > No, it should be tested on HE environment and it depends on your usage. What does happen when only timeout is specified

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt System Test configuration

The engine only updates a short list of packages during host deploy If I remember correctly. See: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/59897/ Martin On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:01 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > > 2017-12-18 13:57 GMT+01:00 Eyal Edri : > >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Sandro

Re: [ovirt-devel] 4.2.0 RC3 blockers status: no go

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:21 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > 1522641 Node > cockpit-ovirt Hosted Engine phbai...@redhat.com ASSIGNED Hosted Engine > deployment looks like stuck, but become up ... >

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ANN] oVirt 4.2.0 Second Candidate Release is now available for testing

> > On my opinion it's just a duplicate of > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512534 > and today Nikolai got it again on RHEL with everything at latest version. > It's not 100% reproducible being a time based issue. I think so as well, I think it has actually nothing to do with the U

Re: [ovirt-devel] 4.2.1 bugs

We are in very similar situation. We have bugs for 4.2.x that are more urgent than what we currently have for 4.3. Including bugs where we already know we will be doing the 4.2.z backport. Martin On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Greg Shereme

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] mom missing on fc27?

nitely possible the rules expect a specific F27 repo somewhere which we do not have.. Martin On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:09 PM Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> I am the maintainer. MOM was properly released >> >> (https://copr.

Re: [ovirt-devel] [VDSM] mom missing on fc27?

I am the maintainer. MOM was properly released (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/msivak/mom-for-ovirt/build/607620/) to F26 and F27 when it was still rawhide and there was no change since then. We should really setup the buildroot inheritance properly so we do not have to manually rebuild ev

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review - Day 4

The Quota bug was not really a blocker, but since it kept the flag, we merged the fix. I just tried to help Ondra with the other one, but we need to wait and see if the fix we got from Fedora guidelines works. Martin On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > we still have 2 op

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2 and UI plugin infrastructure

4:44 PM, Greg Sheremeta wrote: > How does it look at 1920px wide? > > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Martin Sivak wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I see it working with a small UI glitch: >> >> Martin >> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Martin

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2 and UI plugin infrastructure

Hi, I see it working with a small UI glitch: Martin On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: > I will try finding time tomorrow. Thanks. > > Martin > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 6:02 PM, Greg Sheremeta > wrote: > >> Martin, we've merged the fix. (T

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review - Day 3

> >> 1517810 >>> ovirt-engine stira...@redhat.com Adding additional ha-host fails. >>> >> > This one has a verified engine fix now, we just need to merge it and > update Node 0 setup (also verified). > Merged. __

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review - Day 3

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Martin Sivak wrote: > I think a reasonable alternative is to revert the change, adjust HE to use >> both formats, and then introduce the new format. The first step (revert) >> should be done for 4.2.0 (today?) and the rest for 4.2.1. >> Y.

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review - Day 3

> > I think a reasonable alternative is to revert the change, adjust HE to use > both formats, and then introduce the new format. The first step (revert) > should be done for 4.2.0 (today?) and the rest for 4.2.1. > Y. > > The format is still the same, we just needed to autodetect the used NS and t

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review - Day 3

> > >> >> Bug ID Product Assignee Status Summary >> 1518887 >> ovirt-hosted-engine-ha b...@ovirt.org NEW ovirt-ha-agent fails parsing >> the OVF_STORE due to a change in OVF namespace URI >> > > I'm in favor of reverting the virt change personal

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review

> Ouch, the code should now accept both URI, to support OVFs created prior to > the change, as well as new ones. Yeah, we will have to add some detection of the used URI. The library does not support wildcards I am afraid. Martin On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > > On Wed

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2 and UI plugin infrastructure

e: > >> On Wednesday, November 29, 2017 10:16:27 AM EST Martin Sivak wrote: >> > Thanks to you too for checking. >> > >> > Martin >> > >> >> Fix is pending review [1]. We moved the main views to a different class >> hierarchy and i

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2 and UI plugin infrastructure

7 at 8:35 AM, Greg Sheremeta > wrote: > >> +Alexander, can you take a look? >> >> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 8:33 AM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I think I found one issue.. I do not see the extra menu items that were >>> sup

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2 and UI plugin infrastructure

r example, the new dialog styles are completely PatternFly [ > http://www.patternfly.org/pattern-library/forms-and- > controls/modal-overlay/] and we don't do anything extra on top of that. > > Let us know if something doesn't work, or you need help styling something. > &

[ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2 and UI plugin infrastructure

work somehow? Best regards Martin Sivak ___ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review

> > 1516113 cockpit-ovirt phbai...@redhat.com POST Deploy the HostedEngine > failed with the default CPU type > The whole series was merged, but without the obvious patch (which was > abandoned), let me check what the status is. > Fixed too. > > > 1506677 ovirt-engine dchap...@redhat.com POST

Re: [ovirt-devel] oVirt 4.2.0 blockers review

> 1516113 cockpit-ovirt phbai...@redhat.com POST Deploy the HostedEngine failed with the default CPU type The whole series was merged, but without the obvious patch (which was abandoned), let me check what the status is. > 1506677 ovirt-engine dchap...@redhat.com POST Hotplug fail when attaching a

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

Dan Horak used to be part of this project. Lets see if he still remembers that. Dan: Can you please tell us how the s390 builds in Fedora are/were done when no hw was available? Martin Sivak On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Barak Korren wrote: > On 16 November 2017 at 19:38, Martin Si

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

s is correct though. > Does fedora have an s390x server associated to it? They used to have s390 emulators running for that purpose iirc. Best regards Martin Sivak On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Barak Korren wrote: > On 16 November 2017 at 18:52, Viktor Mihajlovski > wrote: >

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding new features to ovirt.org

> I wonder where did this category division come from, some of these, > like "VDSM" or "Infra" or "SLA" may not be easy for users to > understand. > We need to be careful about using internal development terms in user > facing documentation. And yet we require the user to select a team using the s

Re: [ovirt-devel] more aggressive static asset caching in ovirt-engine

? Recompile creates a different filename (because hash changed) which is not cached. That would take care of cache invalidation and it is a common pattern in the CDN world. Best regards Martin Sivak On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 5:49 PM, Greg Sheremeta wrote: > Hi, > > I made some changes [1][2

Re: [ovirt-devel] [oVirt 4.2 Localization Question #5] VM SLA Policy command does not change anything.

uld not be able to get this error message. >> >> The message means that the operation to update the SLA policies does not >> actually update any policy and has no effect. >> >> Andrej >> >> On 26 October 2017 at 10:11, Martin Sivak wrote: >>> &g

Re: [ovirt-devel] [oVirt 4.2 Localization Question #6] Misplaced double quotes?

Hi, I believe the output with quotes is going to be: Please disable KSM by disabling it for the Cluster: "CLUSTER_NAME". This can be done by editing the Cluster and disabling the "Enable KSM" field. The colon or the quotes can probably be removed. But I am not a typography expert. Martin On Fr

Re: [ovirt-devel] [oVirt 4.2 Localization Question #5] VM SLA Policy command does not change anything.

Hi, I think the only way to get this message is to update QoS settings for a VM and keep all the fields intact. I am not sure the user can actually achieve that as we have other checks in place too. I would treat this as a test suite only message for now. Andrej, am I correct? Martin Sivak On

Re: [ovirt-devel] [oVirt 4.2 Localization Question #1] ACTION_TYPE_FAILED_AFFINITY_HOSTS_RULES_COLLISION

, B + C, A - C (plus is positive affinity, minus is negative). Best regards Martin Sivak On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Greg Sheremeta wrote: > Phillip might know > > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Yuko Katabami wrote: >> >> Re-posting. >> Could anyone help us w

Re: [ovirt-devel] Unable to add host in oVirt 4.2 (clean install)

Hi, I ran engine OST this afternoon and it passed. But I also saw Andrej's tracebacks and Jenny reported the same thing yesterday. No idea what is wrong, but both were related to hosted engine setup flow. Martin On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:56 AM, Marek Libra wrote: > Since Andrej ran in similar

Re: [ovirt-devel] Unable to run "make check" on master with an updated Centos7

Well.. isn't tox using virtualenv by any chance? The Python path in the traceback does not look like the standard one Martin On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote: > nope. > > $ rpm -qa |grep -- -six > python2-six-1.10.0-9.fc26.noarch > python3-six-1.10.0-9.fc26.noarch > > On Mo

Re: [ovirt-devel] Code owners configuration for GitHub projects

/test-infra/blob/master/CODEOWNERS). The main repo uses their own OWNERS which is slightly different. Martin On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> Not sure what are they using to identify people, are these GitHub usernames? >> This feels a bit like lock-in. > &

Re: [ovirt-devel] Code owners configuration for GitHub projects

eep this out of the code, or if > they'd adopted Kubernetses format for this instead of inventing thier own. It is the same format. Martin On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:39 PM, Barak Korren wrote: > > > בתאריך 8 בספט׳ 2017 14:18,‏ "Martin Sivak" כתב: > > Hi, > &g

[ovirt-devel] Code owners configuration for GitHub projects

make sense for our GitHub specific projects to do the same. (It might even make sense to follow the same format in Gerrit) Martin Sivak ___ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] Slack channel

re mostly all dead channels (slack > included) > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> > "Not everyone can/will do it." It's a pain. >> >> Why everyone? Someone at oVirt can prepare that for others and just >> keep it runnin

Re: [ovirt-devel] Slack channel

ts. I currently have 15 open irc channels and I will prefer any multi-protocol or federated solution over closed one any day. Martin On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Greg Sheremeta wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> > Right, still it

Re: [ovirt-devel] Feature pages

enable discussion about new or updated features and it is not easy to see what changes are proposed or what was changed recently. Martin On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:09 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> > https://www.ovirt.org/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] Feature pages

Martin On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Jakub Niedermertl wrote: > Hi, > > https://www.ovirt.org/develop/release-management/features/ contains list of > features grouped by versions. > > Jakub > > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:47 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: [ovirt-devel] Feature pages

Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: > Hi, > > Phillip had a nice idea, can we get a page that would list all Feature > pages and allowed sorting / filtering by release they are in and by > the time they where last updated? And of course alphabetically. > >

[ovirt-devel] Feature pages

] What do you think? -- Martin Sivak SLA / oVirt ___ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] Slack channel

> Right, still it is an IRC technology, and every user must set it up in order > to keep their presence (which you get out-of-the-box from above-mentioned). > Not everyone can/will do it. Meaning it is federated, you can connect to any server you want and the protocol is open and dead simple + the

Re: [ovirt-devel] vdsm vds.dispatcher

One more thing: MOM's getStatistics is actually called by VDSM stats reporting code, so my guess here is that someone queries VDSM for stats pretty hard, VDSM then asks MOM for details. Martin On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: > Hi, > >> 2017-0

Re: [ovirt-devel] vdsm vds.dispatcher

Hi, > 2017-08-27 23:15:41,199 - mom.RPCServer - INFO - ping() > 2017-08-27 23:15:41,200 - mom.RPCServer - INFO - getStatistics() > 2017-08-27 23:15:43,946 - mom.RPCServer - INFO - ping() > 2017-08-27 23:15:43,947 - mom.RPCServer - INFO - getStatistics() These are logs from mom's RPC server, someo

Re: [ovirt-devel] Please note: ovirt-hosted-engine-ha builds are failing

Hi Barak, maybe you should stop setting CI+1 before that is fixed? Martin On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Barak Korren wrote: > Hi, > > Builds of ovirt-hosted-engine-ha had been failing for the last 3 merged > patches. > > This is currently not being reported on gerrit because of a known > is

Re: [ovirt-devel] [proposal] deprecate VDSM ping in favor of ping2 and confirmConnectivity

>> A ping that has no side effects and a "watchdog" mechanism to confirm >> connectivity. > > This sounds as exactly the right solution right now. Just to clarify: Removing the undocumented side effects from ping. Not introducing ping2. Martin On Tue, Aug 8, 20

Re: [ovirt-devel] [proposal] deprecate VDSM ping in favor of ping2 and confirmConnectivity

gt; On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 15:10 Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> What stomp heartbeat? There is no such thing in the Python json rpc >> client. >> >> Martin >> >> On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Roy Golan wrote: >> > Why isn't the stomp he

Re: [ovirt-devel] [proposal] deprecate VDSM ping in favor of ping2 and confirmConnectivity

What stomp heartbeat? There is no such thing in the Python json rpc client. Martin On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Roy Golan wrote: > Why isn't the stomp heartbeat enough? > > On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 13:45 Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> MOM and hosted engine use the ping ver

Re: [ovirt-devel] [proposal] deprecate VDSM ping in favor of ping2 and confirmConnectivity

; > On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 at 11:54 Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> > The proposed solution is focused on making sure a command does one thing >> > and >> > not two: >> > A ping that has no side effects and a "watchdog" mechanism to confirm >> &g

Re: [ovirt-devel] [proposal] deprecate VDSM ping in favor of ping2 and confirmConnectivity

> The proposed solution is focused on making sure a command does one thing and > not two: > A ping that has no side effects and a "watchdog" mechanism to confirm > connectivity. This sounds as exactly the right solution right now. >>> Still someone could call conirmConnectivity, no? We do not pr

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] Lowering the bar for wiki contribution?

ently considered (open) projects and review them using the same interface we use for our daily work! This way any team can catch conceptual issues with other teams' projects. Searching through email threads is nowhere near the same experience. [1] kubernetes and Linux kernel just to name two

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ovirt-users] Lowering the bar for wiki contribution?

updates together. Unfortunately that it is hard to do when we have multiple different components to update. So this proposal is probably the next best thing. -- Martin Sivak SLA On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Edward Haas wrote: > Hi all, > > Came back to this thread due to a need to

Re: [ovirt-devel] Who cares about 'memGuaranteedSize'?

Hi Francesco, MOM is using it via the balloon_min key in balloonInfo. The policy that does that is part of the vdsm package though: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=vdsm.git;a=blob;f=static/etc/vdsm/mom.d/02-balloon.policy;h=b1af0d5833619042d8d9f023905efb59a99f2041;hb=209d37b60f55461a80bf0115cdf

Re: [ovirt-devel] Using more specific types in code visible to GWT frontend

prefer if the Java side of out logic and DAOs was not mangled just to make GWT happier. -- Martin Sivak SLA / oVirt ___ Devel mailing list Devel@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [ovirt-devel] high performance VM preset

Or maybe on NUMA nodes. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> In order to maximize performance we may also want to limit the number of >> other VMs (either regular or high performance) running on the same >> host. This to minimize the interference and the

Re: [ovirt-devel] high performance VM preset

> In order to maximize performance we may also want to limit the number of > other VMs (either regular or high performance) running on the same > host. This to minimize the interference and the resource stealing. > > > In the extreme case, just the selected high performance VM would be > allowed to

Re: [ovirt-devel] New design for the Gerrit UI

ific color codes, > otherwise it will be long trial and error process until we'll find > something that will suite everyone. > > > >> >> >> Martin >> >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 5:53 AM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >>> I agree with Milan here

Re: [ovirt-devel] New design for the Gerrit UI

I agree with Milan here. The light green background makes the menu items to be almost unreadable, the search button (slightly different green color) blends with the background and generally the color pulls my eyes away from the content. I wouldn't feel comfortable looking at the screen for a whole

Re: [ovirt-devel] Firewalld migration.

> Engine - no, running from RHVM - yes - if you are using Ansible , I think it > makes sense to use a single common script or possibly per cluster. Exactly my point. The engine should not manage those, but it should still know how to execute them to perform a proper host deploy. Martin On Thu, A

Re: [ovirt-devel] Writing SQL queries in DAO code

> In that case , if we will not use SP , we still will have to secure the data > (for example , hidden columns for some users like in the VDS view) But isn't this the current problem? - The whole permission model is so complicated that nobody wants to write new queries with it. (custom solution)

Re: [ovirt-devel] Firewalld migration.

w host much like we do with host deploy now (except Ansible manages its own ssh connection too). Martin On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> > But we do not want to support custom firewall rules,

Re: [ovirt-devel] Firewalld migration.

2017 at 7:47 PM, Edward Haas wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> > Clients should be made aware their custom rules are going to be obsolete >> > and >> > that they should reapply them once they reinstall. >> >&

Re: [ovirt-devel] Firewalld migration.

> Clients should be made aware their custom rules are going to be obsolete and > that they should reapply them once they reinstall. Would you want to manually fix every reinstalled host? I would consider that very annoying. This has to be somewhat automatic if we want to support custom firewall ru

Re: [ovirt-devel] Firewalld migration.

would just call this role and would stay intact during package upgrades. This is outside of database, allows customization and adapts to whatever firewall backend we might need. -- Martin Sivak SLA / oVirt On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at

Re: [ovirt-devel] Writing SQL queries in DAO code

I agree with Moti, but I think we might have an alternative. Does our DAO layer support named queries (aka PreparedStatements loaded from a properties file)? Those are generally plain SQL queries with arguments that are compiled in advance and still allow direct access to the JDBC internals withou

Re: [ovirt-devel] REST API data aggregation

aniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 6:43 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> >> > 2: you can have more api gateways (e.g. more apis) tailored for every >> > frontend. I don't think we need this - the current API serves us pretty >> > well >> &g

Re: [ovirt-devel] REST API data aggregation

oblem. It's like we're trying to use REST as a replacement >> > for >> > SQL -- but the logic that executes the "SQL" lives in a browser now, and >> > it >> > used to live on a server close to the DB. And REST isn't expressive for >&g

Re: [ovirt-devel] REST API data aggregation

w, and it > used to live on a server close to the DB. And REST isn't expressive for > selecting data like SQL is. > > There must be some industry solution to this "I want to do SQL over REST" > problem. > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Martin Sivak wrote: >&g

Re: [ovirt-devel] REST API data aggregation

, but it will reduce protocol overhead. I think this is the simplest first step that requires almost no change to existing infrastructure. -- Martin Sivak SLA / oVirt On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Tomas Jelinek wrote: > Hi All, > > for quite some time I have been more or less in

Re: [ovirt-devel] Introducing engine micro-benchmarks

Hi, I am just wondering whether you tried Roman's Hystrix integration to see what command was so slow? Martin On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Roy Golan wrote: > Lately we came across an interesting case where multi-host+mult-networks > resulted editing a host to conclude in minutes. One assum

Re: [ovirt-devel] HE setup failure

I see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1101554 as VERIFIED so I guess it is. Martin On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Nir Soffer wrote: > Sahina, Martin, can you confirm that this issue is resolved now? > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> Hi, &g

Re: [ovirt-devel] [REQUEST FOR COMMENTS] oVirt features tracking and documentation

How are we going to track possible contributions from the community? Those won't have any bugzilla associated in general. And we want them and we want to lower the hurdle for other people to contribute. Especially for the side projects we have (the engine is quite a beast, but we have smaller or ne

Re: [ovirt-devel] OST: HE vm does not restart on HC setup

Btw, this whole thing is probably the oldest untouched piece of hosted engine we have. It worked till now :) Martin On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Martin Sivak wrote: >> broke HA. Could you perhaps fixing it checking that the message *begins* >> with that string, and/or checki

Re: [ovirt-devel] OST: HE vm does not restart on HC setup

> broke HA. Could you perhaps fixing it checking that the message *begins* > with that string, and/or checking the error code. bests, Already done: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/72791/ Martin On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Francesco Romani wrote: > On 02/22/2017 01:53 PM, Simone Tiraboschi wr

  1   2   3   >