On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 11:11, Simone Tiraboschi
> wrote:
> >
> > if you have both yesterday patches it was going to fail due to the lack
> of
> > rh-postgresql95-postgresql-server
> >
> >
On 6 September 2017 at 11:11, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
>
> if you have both yesterday patches it was going to fail due to the lack of
> rh-postgresql95-postgresql-server
>
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81478/ should be enough to require
> rh-postgresql95-postgresql-server by
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:03 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 10:58, Simone Tiraboschi
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > We already found an rpm dependency issue on upgrade so now I'd say:
> > https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81478 and
On 6 September 2017 at 10:58, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
>
>
> We already found an rpm dependency issue on upgrade so now I'd say:
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81478 and https://gerrit.ovirt.org/81476 (still to
> be merged) in order to solve also that issue.
>
Hmm... I thought
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> On 6 September 2017 at 10:42, Simone Tiraboschi
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5 September 2017 at 17:59, Simone Tiraboschi
On 6 September 2017 at 10:42, Simone Tiraboschi wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
>>
>> On 5 September 2017 at 17:59, Simone Tiraboschi
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Dan
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Barak Korren wrote:
> On 5 September 2017 at 17:59, Simone Tiraboschi
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Dan Kenigsberg
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I believe that this issue is being tackled by
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 8:11 PM, Simone Tiraboschi
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Simone Tiraboschi
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Evgheni Dereveanchin > > wrote:
>>
>>> Test failed: [
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 3:54 PM, Evgheni Dereveanchin
wrote:
> Test failed: [ upgrade_engine ]
>
> Link to suspected patches:
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78307/46/
>
> Link to Job:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/2301/
> * this is failing
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> I believe that this issue is being tackled by
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81444/
No, the issue is on DWH setup side but we merged the related patches there
almost together.
Not sure why OST is consuming an older DWH
Test failed: [ upgrade_engine ]
Link to suspected patches:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/78307/46/
Link to Job:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/2301/
* this is failing since around job run 2291 but was masked by other errors
Link to logs:
I believe that this issue is being tackled by
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81444/
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote:
> + Simone.
> Y.
>
> On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Evgheni Dereveanchin
> wrote:
>>
>> Test failed: [ upgrade_engine ]
>>
+ Simone.
Y.
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Evgheni Dereveanchin
wrote:
> Test failed: [ upgrade_engine ]
>
> Link to suspected patches:
> https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81205/9
>
> Link to Job:
> http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/2289/
>
> Link
Test failed: [ upgrade_engine ]
Link to suspected patches:
https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/81205/9
Link to Job:
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-master_change-queue-tester/2289/
Link to all logs:
14 matches
Mail list logo