Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status (building RC2 today!)

2015-03-18 Thread Maor Lipchuk
Hi Sandro, Regarding my patches which have been merged for 3.5.3 and not backported to 3.5.2 branch, it looks fine, they should not be backported since most of them are targeted to RHEV 3.5.2 Thanks, Maor - Forwarded Message - > From: "Sandro Bonazzola" > To: "Eli Mesika" , "Ido B

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status (building RC2 today!)

2015-03-18 Thread Simone Tiraboschi
irt.org, > "Adam Litke" , > "Vered Volansky" > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:18:14 AM > Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status > (building RC2 today!) > > > On Mar 18, 2015 9:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wro

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status (building RC2 today!)

2015-03-18 Thread Oved Ourfali
On Mar 18, 2015 9:57 AM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > > Hi, > we still have 5 open blockers for 3.5.2[1]: > > Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary > 1161012 infra POST task cleaning utility  should erase commands that have > running tasks Simone, latest comment by you implies that it is working no

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status (building RC2 today!)

2015-03-18 Thread Francesco Romani
- Original Message - > From: "Sandro Bonazzola" > To: "Eli Mesika" , "Ido Barkan" , > "Adam Litke" , > "Francesco Romani" , "Maor Lipchuk" > , "Vered Volansky" > , "Eli Mesika" , us...@ovirt.org, > devel@ovirt.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 8:56:17 AM > Subject: [ACTION REQUIRE

[ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status (building RC2 today!)

2015-03-18 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi, we still have 5 open blockers for 3.5.2[1]: Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1161012 infra POSTtask cleaning utility should erase commands that have running tasks 1187244 network POST[RHEL 7.0 + 7.1] Host configure with DHCP is losin

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status

2015-03-12 Thread Lior Vernia
On 12/03/15 08:41, Ido Barkan wrote: > 1187244 - 2, 3 work weeks I assume. we aim for 3.5.1. > RHEV 3.5.1, so oVirt 3.5.2. It'll be tough to get it in RC2, but I think we'd still want it in the GA if we can get it fixed by then. > - Original Message - > From: "Adam Litke" > To: "Sandr

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status

2015-03-12 Thread Tal Nisan
On 03/11/2015 02:33 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Hi, We still have 8 open blockers for 3.5.2[1]: Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1195119 infra POST[backend] [NPE] Adding permission to an object fails if DEBUG level is set 1190466 integration NEW

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status

2015-03-11 Thread Ido Barkan
1187244 - 2, 3 work weeks I assume. we aim for 3.5.1. - Original Message - From: "Adam Litke" To: "Sandro Bonazzola" Cc: "Amit Aviram" , "Yedidyah Bar David" , "Ido Barkan" , "Martin Perina" , "Tal Nisan" , "Maor Lipchuk" , "Eyal Edri" , us...@ovirt.org, devel@ovirt.org Sent: Wednesda

Re: [ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status

2015-03-11 Thread Adam Litke
On 11/03/15 13:33 +0100, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: Hi, We still have 8 open blockers for 3.5.2[1]: Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1177220 storage ASSIGNED[BLOCKED] Failed to Delete First NFS snapshot with live merge Eric Blake is creating a workaround for libvir

[ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status

2015-03-11 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi, We still have 8 open blockers for 3.5.2[1]: Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1195119 infra POST[backend] [NPE] Adding permission to an object fails if DEBUG level is set 1190466 integration NEW HEAP_MAX default value as 1G must be changed

[ovirt-devel] [ACTION REQUIRED] oVirt 3.5.2 and 3.5.3 status

2015-03-04 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi, We still have one open blocker for 3.5.2[1]: Bug ID Whiteboard Status Summary 1176937 virtASSIGNEDInstance type: delta icon (new configuration for next run) does not appear on running pool VMs. ACTION: Tomas Jelinek to provide ETA for the blocker bug. We a