Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-14 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:24:27 +0100 Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 10.12.2017 10:10, Barak Korren wrote: > [...] > > > > An update for everyone woh may have been watching this thread - we > > made it work. > What a nice surprise after returning from a few days off.

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-14 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 10.12.2017 12:58, Fred Rolland wrote: > I am getting some error logs when the engine starts looking for s390 icons. > Nothing critical, but add noise > > 2017-12-10 13:51:01,987+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.IconLoader] > (ServerService Thread Pool -- 53) []

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-14 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 14.12.2017 11:34, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 11:24:27 +0100 [...] >> Lately, I've been using Fedora 27 for the s390x porting, mostly >> because the newer package levels of the key virtualization >> components. If possible, Fedora 27 would be nice. > > The Marist College agrees to

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-14 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 10.12.2017 10:10, Barak Korren wrote: [...] > > An update for everyone woh may have been watching this thread - we made it > work. What a nice surprise after returning from a few days off. Big thanks to both of you, Barak and Dan. > > With Dan's kind help we've attached an s390x VM to

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-10 Thread Fred Rolland
I am getting some error logs when the engine starts looking for s390 icons. Nothing critical, but add noise 2017-12-10 13:51:01,987+02 WARN [org.ovirt.engine.core.bll.IconLoader] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 53) [] java.lang.RuntimeException: Icon for other_s390x was not found in

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-10 Thread Barak Korren
On 10 December 2017 at 13:38, Greg Sheremeta wrote: > > > Great job all! So I guess the question is, for those of us that maintain > oVirt projects, are there any that we know need s390x support added for? > > Well, Viktor Mihajlovski had been contributing patches to VDSM

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-10 Thread Greg Sheremeta
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 4:10 AM, Barak Korren wrote: > On 24 November 2017 at 14:36, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:16:53 +0200 > > Barak Korren wrote: > > > >> On 24 November 2017 at 11:05, Viktor Mihajlovski > >>

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-12-10 Thread Barak Korren
On 24 November 2017 at 14:36, Dan Horák wrote: > On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 13:16:53 +0200 > Barak Korren wrote: > >> On 24 November 2017 at 11:05, Viktor Mihajlovski >> wrote: >> > On 21.11.2017 11:26, Dan Horák wrote: >> > [...] >> >>>

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-26 Thread Barak Korren
On 24 November 2017 at 14:36, Dan Horák wrote: > > ok, I'm pretty sure we can make it work :-) Please send me your > public SSH key and preferred username, then I'll set up you an account > for you and we can work on the remaining details. > I would actually like two keys to be

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-26 Thread Dan Horák
sending once more for the s390x list ... On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:05:06 +0100 Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 21.11.2017 11:26, Dan Horák wrote: > [...] > >> qemu s390x emulation does not work with code compiled for z12. > >> Would a real virtual machine be what you

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-24 Thread Barak Korren
On 24 November 2017 at 11:05, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 21.11.2017 11:26, Dan Horák wrote: > [...] >>> qemu s390x emulation does not work with code compiled for z12. >>> Would a real virtual machine be what you need? >>> The Fedora team DOES have access to a z13.

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-24 Thread Dan Horák
On Fri, 24 Nov 2017 10:05:06 +0100 Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 21.11.2017 11:26, Dan Horák wrote: > [...] > >> qemu s390x emulation does not work with code compiled for z12. > >> Would a real virtual machine be what you need? > >> The Fedora team DOES have access

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-24 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 21.11.2017 11:26, Dan Horák wrote: [...] >> qemu s390x emulation does not work with code compiled for z12. >> Would a real virtual machine be what you need? >> The Fedora team DOES have access to a z13. Not sure how much >> resources are available, but can you contact Dan Horak (on cc) if >>

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-21 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:24:00 +0100 Martin Sivak wrote: > Dan Horak used to be part of this project. Lets see if he still > remembers that. > > Dan: Can you please tell us how the s390 builds in Fedora are/were > done when no hw was available? AFAIK Fedora was always building

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-21 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 20 Nov 2017 09:16:48 +0100 Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 11/19/2017 09:53 AM, Barak Korren wrote: > > On 18 November 2017 at 13:14, Barak Korren > > wrote: > >> On 16 November 2017 at 19:38, Martin Sivak > >>

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-20 Thread Martin Sivak
Dan Horak used to be part of this project. Lets see if he still remembers that. Dan: Can you please tell us how the s390 builds in Fedora are/were done when no hw was available? Martin Sivak On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Barak Korren wrote: > On 16 November 2017 at

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-19 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 16.11.2017 18:27, Barak Korren wrote: >> On 16 November 2017 at 18:52, Viktor Mihajlovski >> wrote: >>> >>> Short update, with yesterday's API model 4.2.25 release, there's

[ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-19 Thread R P Herrold
On Fri, 17 Nov 2017, Peter Robinson wrote: > We don't currently have s390x EPEL ummm -- I think Peter is suggesting EPEL executables -- this is a solved problem The ClefOS s390x distribution has all of RHEL 6, RHEL 7, EPEL 6, EPEL 7, and more in s390x, and has had for years. Neale Ferguson

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-19 Thread Barak Korren
On 18 November 2017 at 13:14, Barak Korren wrote: > On 16 November 2017 at 19:38, Martin Sivak wrote: >>> Koji is very opinionated about how RPMs and specfiles should look, >>> AFAIK >> >> Actually, koji does not care much. Fedora packaging rules are

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-18 Thread Barak Korren
On 16 November 2017 at 19:38, Martin Sivak wrote: >> Koji is very opinionated about how RPMs and specfiles should look, >> AFAIK > > Actually, koji does not care much. Fedora packaging rules are enforced > by package reviewers. > >> More specifically, Koji usually assumes the

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-18 Thread Barak Korren
On 17 November 2017 at 10:45, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > On 16.11.2017 18:27, Barak Korren wrote: >> On 16 November 2017 at 18:52, Viktor Mihajlovski >> wrote: >>> >>> Short update, with yesterday's API model 4.2.25 release, there's

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-17 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 16.11.2017 18:27, Barak Korren wrote: > On 16 November 2017 at 18:52, Viktor Mihajlovski > wrote: >> >> Short update, with yesterday's API model 4.2.25 release, there's basic >> support for s390 available in ovirt-engine. At this point in time, there >> are no

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-16 Thread Martin Sivak
> Koji is very opinionated about how RPMs and specfiles should look, > AFAIK Actually, koji does not care much. Fedora packaging rules are enforced by package reviewers. > More specifically, Koji usually assumes the starting point for the > build process would be a specfile This is correct

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-16 Thread Barak Korren
On 16 November 2017 at 18:52, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > > Short update, with yesterday's API model 4.2.25 release, there's basic > support for s390 available in ovirt-engine. At this point in time, there > are no ovirt yum repositories for the s390x architecture -

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-11-16 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 18.09.2017 09:30, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > Hi, > > as a heads up: I'd like to contribute some basic support for the s390 > architecture to oVirt. For that purpose I'll post some patches to > gerrit, mostly for the following repositories: VDSM, > ovirt-engine-api-model and ovirt-engine.

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-09-18 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
On 18.09.2017 10:36, Barak Korren wrote: > On 18 September 2017 at 10:30, Viktor Mihajlovski > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> as a heads up: I'd like to contribute some basic support for the s390 >> architecture to oVirt. For that purpose I'll post some patches to >> gerrit,

Re: [ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-09-18 Thread Barak Korren
On 18 September 2017 at 10:30, Viktor Mihajlovski wrote: > Hi, > > as a heads up: I'd like to contribute some basic support for the s390 > architecture to oVirt. For that purpose I'll post some patches to > gerrit, mostly for the following repositories: VDSM, >

[ovirt-devel] Adding s390 support to oVirt

2017-09-18 Thread Viktor Mihajlovski
Hi, as a heads up: I'd like to contribute some basic support for the s390 architecture to oVirt. For that purpose I'll post some patches to gerrit, mostly for the following repositories: VDSM, ovirt-engine-api-model and ovirt-engine. There might be some collateral patches that need to go into