Hi,
I tested these features:
1073453 - OVIRT35 - [RFE] add Debian 7 to the list of operating systems when
creating a new vm
Info: Debian 7 is listed in OS in new VM dialog
Result: success
1047624 - OVIRT35 - [RFE] support BIOS boot device menu
Info: Boot menu has to be enabled i
Hi all,
I tested today [RFE] replace XML-RPC communication (engine-vdsm) with json-rpc
based on bidirectional transport
First I upgraded ovirt-3.4 stable engine to ovirt-3.5 - ok
Then I upgraded 4 hosts to latest vdsm - ok
I upgraded 2 data centers to cluster version 3.5:
- 2 Fedora 19 hosts wi
Hi,
This time I have tested the below RFE:
[RFE] Change the "Slot" field to "Service Profile" when cisco_ucs is
selected as the fencing type.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090803
Test Data
===
Running oVirt 3.5 with Power Management enabled in hosts when selecting
Type
I tested:
* [RFE] Prevent host fencing while kdumping
- http://www.ovirt.org/Fence_kdump
* hosted-engine-setup
Results:
Bug 1115123 -- hosted-engine-setup fails with ioprocess oop_impl enabled
Adding a host with Detect kdump flow set to on and without crashkernel
command line parameter result
Sorry for being a lot late with this, but I finally got around to writing the
result email.
I tested:
OVIRT35 - [RFE][host-deploy] support more ciphers for ssh.
I did a basic engine install on Fedora 20. And I installed a minimal Fedora
20 for my host. After configuring the engine and starting
nice test, Nir.
would you mind adding the important bugs to 3.5 tracker [1]?
I'd agree that not being able to upgrade without removal of all hosts and vms
is a blocker for a release:-)
others seem to be quite important too
Thanks,
michal
[1] http://bugzilla.redhat.com/1073943
On Jul 1, 2014, at
Re-tested this for Test day 2, with the same results, everything came up
perfectly without any issues noted.
On Monday, July 21, 2014 02:45:52 PM Alexander Wels wrote:
> Sorry for being a lot late with this, but I finally got around to writing
> the result email.
>
> I tested:
> OVIRT35 - [RFE][
Hi,
today I played with this feature [1]:
- Win7 VM without custom Sysprep override in VM dialog
- Win7 VM with custom Sysprep override in VM dialog
- REST API call to check custom Sysprep override for VM
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080002
It worked for me without any probl
On 09.07.14 12:44, Vojtech Szocs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I played with this feature [1]:
>
> - Win7 VM without custom Sysprep override in VM dialog
> - Win7 VM with custom Sysprep override in VM dialog
> - REST API call to check custom Sysprep override for VM
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
