While I can think of a few good uses for this chip I'm still not sold on
BLE being a good thing for the "Internet of Things". Historically, the
Bluetooth SIG has been less than open. Does anyone remember the SIG having
BlueZ's site (maybe it was just a mailing list) taken down back in about
2004-20
Hi everyone,
sandwiching the H&A is indeed not a good idea, I agree.
Thanks Martine for the doodle, let's wait until Thursday and decide on
the dates based on the outcome of the doodle then.
Cheers,
Hauke
On 19.01.2015 13:17, Martine Lenders wrote:
Hi,
Since this thread has gained some tr
Hi,
Since this thread has gained some traction now I would propose to use to
dudle it out. The two days adjacent to each other where most are available
would be the date: https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/RIOT-NSFT1/
Cheers,
Martine
Am 19.01.2015 12:29 schrieb "Emmanuel Baccelli" :
> Hi Thomas,
> d
HI,
am very very sceptical about this softdevice and its licensing... (or the
licensing in future).
for me it would be important to have an option to run riot without it. I
currently have a
nordic chip that does not seem to override the softdevice any more (there are
some rumors
that you can onl
Hi Thomas,
damn, your right, I misread the dates. So Hack'nAck would be "sandwiched"
inside the workshop, and I guess that's not great. How about 28-29, or
29-30, then?
Best
Emmanuel
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Thomas Eichinger <
thomas.eichin...@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’d also like
Hi,
I’d also like to attend. I’d prefer a date without H&A in-between (as these
tend to
end late at night, which would make it hard to start with NSTF early again) but
wouldn’t object if there is a majority in favour of this.
Best, Thomas
> On 16 Jan 2015, at 19:08, Hauke Petersen wrote:
>
>
Hi,
I would also like to attend. I'm also of the opinion that Hack'n'Ack should
be a separated event from this taskforce meeting.
However, maybe 1,5 days could be enough for the workshop, and this would
mean that 27th +28th until Hack'n'Ack starts could still fit?
Cheers,
Emmanuel
On Mon, Jan 19,
Am 19.01.2015 um 09:18 schrieb Hauke Petersen:
Hi,
I missed it indeed, seems they beat us to it. Havn't looked into detail,
but if their code quality is the same than for the soft devices, we
might have a good argument for using RIOT once more :-)
all the code is BSD, except the softdevice.
$
Hi,
I missed it indeed, seems they beat us to it. Havn't looked into detail,
but if their code quality is the same than for the soft devices, we
might have a good argument for using RIOT once more :-)
Cheers,
Hauke
On 18.01.2015 19:28, Arvid E. Picciani wrote:
In case you missed it: Nordic
