Re: [riot-devel] Border-router and multicast

2016-05-11 Thread Kaspar Schleiser
Hey, On 05/11/2016 09:42 PM, Martine Lenders wrote: > (2) I'm not sure you add multicast routing entries this way in Linux. You don't. If really desired, you have to use the "local" routing table. # ip -6 route list table local Kaspar ___ devel mailin

Re: [riot-devel] Border-router and multicast

2016-05-11 Thread Martine Lenders
Hi again, 2016-05-11 21:42 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders : > Hi Baptist, > > First of all, sorry for the late reply. > > 2016-05-11 10:05 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Clenet : > >> Ok Martine, >> >> In the start_network.sh, create_tap(), you route >> ip route add ${PREFIX} via fe80::2 dev ${TAP} >> Ok so if I

Re: [riot-devel] Border-router and multicast

2016-05-11 Thread Martine Lenders
Hi Baptist, First of all, sorry for the late reply. 2016-05-11 10:05 GMT+02:00 Baptiste Clenet : > Ok Martine, > > In the start_network.sh, create_tap(), you route > ip route add ${PREFIX} via fe80::2 dev ${TAP} > Ok so if I want multicast, I should add > ip route add ff04::1/64 via fe80::2 dev

Re: [riot-devel] Unifying the interfaces of the digest functions

2016-05-11 Thread Mathias Tausig
Just created a pull request for it. https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/5430 On Mit, 2016-05-11 at 12:31 +0200, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > > > > > Hi Matthias! > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:12:42PM +0200, Mathias Tausig wrote: > > > >

Re: [riot-devel] Unifying the interfaces of the digest functions

2016-05-11 Thread Emmanuel Baccelli
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:26 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: > Hi Matthias! > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:12:42PM +0200, Mathias Tausig wrote: > > The interafces used by the cryptographic digest functions sha256, sha1 > and md5 > > (xx_init, xx_update, xx_final) are very inconsistent at the moment. > > Wo

Re: [riot-devel] Unifying the interfaces of the digest functions

2016-05-11 Thread Oleg Hahm
Hi Matthias! On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:12:42PM +0200, Mathias Tausig wrote: > The interafces used by the cryptographic digest functions sha256, sha1 and md5 > (xx_init, xx_update, xx_final) are very inconsistent at the moment. > Would a patch which would consolidate this situation be desirable?

[riot-devel] Unifying the interfaces of the digest functions

2016-05-11 Thread Mathias Tausig
Hy! The interafces used by the cryptographic digest functions sha256, sha1 and md5 (xx_init, xx_update, xx_final) are very inconsistent at the moment. Would a patch which would consolidate this situation be desirable? cheers Mathias signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

[riot-devel] SAMR21: Event

2016-05-11 Thread Baptiste Clenet
Hi, Has anyone tried to use Event peripheral on samr21? p401/1204 http://www.mouser.com/ds/2/36/Atmel-42223-SAM-R21_Datasheet-604417.pdf Cheers, -- Baptiste ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] Border-router and multicast

2016-05-11 Thread Baptiste Clenet
Ok Martine, In the start_network.sh, create_tap(), you route ip route add ${PREFIX} via fe80::2 dev ${TAP} Ok so if I want multicast, I should add ip route add ff04::1/64 via fe80::2 dev ${TAP} But it does not work 2016-05-10 19:32 GMT+02:00 Martine Lenders : > Sorry, was (and still am) otherwise