On Jul 28, 2018, at 13:12, Gunar Schorcht wrote:
>
> In this case, should no CAN device driver be available to prevent
> license violation by RIOT users?
We are not the patent police. Having the software in a repository is not
practicing any invention that may be under patent protection. How
Hello,
RIOT defines a low-level CAN device driver interface.
Suppose the MCU (for example, Espressifs ESP32) provides a CAN hardware
implementation that could be used to integrate CAN peripherals into RIOT
if there were a low-level CAN device driver for it. So I thought about
including such a low
