Hi,
> I am a relatively new user to Riot OS. I understand that this type of
> proposal from a new user may be frowned upon or unwarranted. So I understand
> if this idea gets shot down and closed. However, I would like to see if there
> is any interest in using Gitter rather than freednode and
d the modern linker should remove the
unused functions. I pour a little oil into the fire: some developer overdo it
with the macros and the driver (also other) sources look like "a macro-monster
has puked on the display".
Regards,
Johann Fischer
Am 15.06.2016 um 14:35 schrieb Martine Lenders:
Hi,
Should we rathe change to skype & co?
Cheers,
Martine
+1
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[2].
[1] http://www.phytec.de/produkt/internet-of-things/phystick-kw2x/
[2] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/3890
Cheers,
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
:-)
About RNDIS:
- why should RIOT supports a Microsoft proprietary protocol?
- why not CDC-ECM or CDC-EEM ?
Cheers,
[1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/3890
[2] https://github.com/jfischer-phytec-iot/RIOT/tree/test%40cdc-ecm
--
Johann Fischer
/btusb.c
[4] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/labels/Newbie-Task-Candidate
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/pull/3890#issuecomment-154106351
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
use):
http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/linus
And that is also interesting:
http://harmful.cat-v.org/software/c++/coders-at-work
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
tps://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://li
?
Regards
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
wiki/Board%3A-Phytec-phyWAVE-KW22
[2]
http://www.phytec.de/de/produkte/internet-of-things/evaluierungskit/produktdetails/p/iot-enablement-kit.html
Best regards
Johann Fischer
Am 29.05.2015 um 05:19 schrieb Alexander Talavari:
Hello,
As part of my MScThesis i will be devoloping on RIOT and i wa
28 SiP", outdated, I'll update it in the next
days:
https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2328
> From my point of view, best option is to have one common
> kinetis_family directory with all driver regardless of the family.
>
> Jozef
>
--
Johann Fischer
___
;function pointer based HAL" and I think more of them will
make RIOT much better :-).
--
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e that RIOT will be more attractive by other
measures. Currently we rely on RIOT as first choice, with a change to BSD
license we would think it over again.
Best regards
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
M.Eng. Johann Fischer
- Entwicklung -
PHYTEC Messtechnik GmbH
Robert-Koch-Str. 39
55129 Main
t; improvements back.
> >
> >
>
> OK. So is LGPLv2 indeed aligned with your company's policy and legal
> department?
> That would be interesting to know for this discussion.
Yes, even if it is not always comfortable.
> Best,
>
&
ny we have interests that if a
competitor uses our work, it would be forced to admit changes or
improvements back.
Best regards
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
mentation and attach to #2059[1].
Then i will rebase it so that you can cherry-pick and test the
peripheral driver (i2c, spi ...). If it works then we can start with
kinetis_common. What do you think?
Johann Fischer
[1] https://github.com/RIOT-OS/RIOT/pull/2059
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
this does not work reliable.
There is also a RTC module, but it fits even less for the hwtimer.
Ideas?
Regards,
Johann Fischer
___
devel mailing list
devel@riot-os.org
http://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, do you think BSD/MIT would:
>
> - harm the RIOT community?
-yes, not everyone will agree with the change.
> - harm the RIOT code base?
-no, but I think it will not improve the code base.
> If so how, and at which stage (short, mid long term), and how bad? Is it
> worse the risk
l. Please send
> your opinion to the list before Dec. 10th.
I am absolutely against the BSD license and I see no necessity for it. RIOT
will be successful without this change.
That is my personal opinion, not the company where I work.
Best regards
Johann Fischer
_
20 matches
Mail list logo
