Hi Joakim,
What is the current state of radio duty cycling in RIOT?
I know that radio drivers implement on and off functions for the chip, but
how do we make the best use of them?
In order to reduce power consumption it will be necessary to duty cycle
the radio
I would agree with Martine: usua
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Ken Bannister wrote:
> Oleg,
>
>
>>> There's definitely a need for generic MAC layer solutions in RIOT,
>> besides the
>> specific solutions like CSMA in the cc110x driver or TiSCH for 802.15.4e
>> as
>> part of the OpenWSN stack. As far as I know, at least two p
Oleg,
I'm a contributor to OpenWSN, making a first post here based on your
mention below.
On 03/17/2015 02:58 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote:
Hi Joakim!
What is the current state of radio duty cycling in RIOT?
I know that radio drivers implement on and off functions for the chip, but
how do we make t
Hi Joakim!
> What is the current state of radio duty cycling in RIOT?
> I know that radio drivers implement on and off functions for the chip, but
> how do we make the best use of them?
> In order to reduce power consumption it will be necessary to duty cycle
> the radio
I would agree with Mart
Hello Joakim,
currently there are no specific plans to utilize the power modes of the
radios to my knowledge, except that mostly MAC/link layers will implement
it. So if you have any idea: feel free to speak about it.
Cheers,
Martine
2015-03-17 10:05 GMT+01:00 Joakim Gebart :
> Hello RIOTers,
>
Hello RIOTers,
What is the current state of radio duty cycling in RIOT?
I know that radio drivers implement on and off functions for the chip, but
how do we make the best use of them?
In order to reduce power consumption it will be necessary to duty cycle
the radio
.
For comparison, in
Cont
