On 2/13/2015 2:54 AM, Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/02/2015 7:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 13/02/15 08:56, Daniel Cederman wrote:
Daniel(s), could enlighten me why this is needed ? Is this a arch
constraint or something else ?
Chris
It is an arch constraint. On SPARC, for example, all
Just to clarify: the ability to provide a new piece of binary
corresponding to a driver and replace the existing one.
Have anybody tried this before?
Thanks!
Daniel.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Daniel Gutson
daniel.gut...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
Hi,
is there any current
Hi,
is there any current experience / support with hot patching? E.g.
patching a driver while the whole system is running.
Thanks,
Daniel.
--
Daniel F. Gutson
Chief Engineering Officer, SPD
San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Office 5
Córdoba, Argentina
Phone: +54 351 4217888 / +54 351
Hi
I noticed running fileio.exe that _Copyright_Notice is out of date.
I can update the year but should it be changed more?
I don't think this impacts the minimum size.
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research Development
joel.sherr...@oarcorp.comOn-Line Applications
A project is looking at using RTEMS on an FPGA based ARM Cortex-M1 like
the one in the Microsemi ProAsic3L development kit:
http://www.microsemi.com/products/fpga-soc/design-resources/dev-kits/proasi
c3/cortex-m1-enabled-proasic3l-development-kit
Wikipedia says the Cortex-M1 is an ARMv6M
On 14/02/15 02:58, Cudmore, Alan P. (GSFC-5820) wrote:
A project is looking at using RTEMS on an FPGA based ARM Cortex-M1 like
the one in the Microsemi ProAsic3L development kit:
http://www.microsemi.com/products/fpga-soc/design-resources/dev-kits/proasi