Re: [PATCH] [RSB] or1k: correct the md5 hash of the GCC patch

2015-04-29 Thread Hesham ALMatary
Hi, This patch is needed, otherwise RSB wouldn't be able to build or1k toolchain. I was thinking of getting rid of this hash as this patch may be modified. Or, we can refer directly to the latest or1k gcc-4.9.2 [1] until they upstream it, as our patches are already applied there. [1] https://gith

Re: GSoC projects announced

2015-04-29 Thread Gedare Bloom
It came to my attention that the Doodle interface is a bit awkward. To register your time preferences you must hit the "Save" icon, which may be presented at the far right of the schedule selection. Gedare On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Congratulations to our accepted stu

Re: [PATCH] libmisc/cpuuse: Top support for current load.

2015-04-29 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 29/04/2015 5:22 am, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 29/04/2015 4:48 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: >>> Are other fields worth being >>> used to sort? (Could be a small open project) >> >> It could be added without much effort. I will have a look. >> > > I

Re: SOCIS2015_EHTESHAMIFAR_FaultTolerance - Invitation to comment

2015-04-29 Thread Saeed Ehteshamifar
I've resolved all of Gedare's comments and slightly changed my proposal. Here is the published link to the document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rVEhyHXajAVMcqgrOR-0t84596QUkYOnifoaYpa8QYM/pub I've also applied via SOCIS website today and mentioned the link above as for my proposal. Accord

Re: [PATCH] [RSB] or1k: correct the md5 hash of the GCC patch

2015-04-29 Thread Chris Johns
On 29/04/2015 8:05 pm, Hesham ALMatary wrote: > > This patch is needed, otherwise RSB wouldn't be able to build or1k > toolchain. I was thinking of getting rid of this hash as this patch > may be modified. Normally a patch does not change and you increment a minor number or change a date in the f