Hi Saurabh,
This is a current problem in RTEMS. You need to have 'pax' installed
on your development host to build the dl tests. So, it looks good to
me!
Gedare
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:16 PM, Saurabh Gadia wrote:
> I am sorry for not attaching the patch and configuration command:
>
> ../rtems/
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Premysl Houdek has prepared new and hopefully near ready
> complete header files for TMS570LS3137 microcontroller.
> They are based on PDF documentation and license is
> RTEMS compatible. The scripts used during process can be
> fo
Hi Sebastian,
is this industrial-grade fully functional, or has known issues? If
it has, we could fix them.
Thanks,
Daniel.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:01 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> On 16/05/15 20:53, Afshin Jamaali (Arian) wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> Sorry, it seems a problem exist
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'll be curious to see what tms570 users think of the generated headers.
We've been quite busy lately, but I'll take a look as soon as I can.
--
Martin Galvan
Software Engineer
Taller Technologies Argentina
San Lorenzo 47, 3rd Floor, Off
Since 'waf' requires four params and 'make' only three in config.inc,
I got confused with waf. Could anyone help me with waf params? Here is
my config.inc:
TARGET = arm-rtems4.11
BSP = c/raspberrypi/make
PREFIX = /home/gtament/development/rtems/src/b-rpi
Thanks in advance)
__
Ok. Thanks a lot. Will continue with compiling and JPF setup this week as
discussed with Cyrille. And if time permits will look into how to emulate
the things in JPF. And also provide ppt in deoxygen for revised rtems code.
On Friday, June 5, 2015, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi Saurabh,
>
> This is a
>From what I could make out from the documentation in README.waf,
in waf configure , --prefix is where you would like to install rtems-libbsd,
--rtems is where you installed your bsp, that is, the '--prefix' you
passed while configuring the bsp.
'--rtems-tools' points to the tool-set you built usin
2015-06-05 21:02 GMT+03:00 Sujay Raj :
> From what I could make out from the documentation in README.waf,
> in waf configure , --prefix is where you would like to install rtems-libbsd,
> --rtems is where you installed your bsp, that is, the '--prefix' you
> passed while configuring the bsp.
> '--rt
Hello Gedare,
thanks for response.
On Friday 05 of June 2015 18:18:15 Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> > Please, look on the files and express your opinion.
> > The new temporary top level header files is tms5702.h.
> > It should replace tms570.h.
>
> I t
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
> Hello Gedare,
>
> thanks for response.
>
> On Friday 05 of June 2015 18:18:15 Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote:
>> > Please, look on the files and express your opinion.
>> > The new temporary top level head
Hi,
installing pax work. But you have to again do the bootstrap step,
configuration and compiling.
Thanks.
Thanks,
Saurabh Gadia
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> I'm not really sure, but I think you probably have to re-run configure.
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Sa
Here is what I get now:
No valid arch/bsps found
where --rtems-bsps=arm/raspberrypi
also tried archs: armv6, arm-rtems4.11
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 6/06/2015 8:47 am, Yurii Shevtsov wrote:
> Here is what I get now:
>No valid arch/bsps found
> where --rtems-bsps=arm/raspberrypi
> also tried archs: armv6, arm-rtems4.11
Have you installed the BSP ?
What is the full rtems configure command line ?
What is the full waf configure command l
On 6/06/2015 4:38 am, Yurii Shevtsov wrote:
> 2015-06-05 21:02 GMT+03:00 Sujay Raj :
>> From what I could make out from the documentation in README.waf,
>> in waf configure , --prefix is where you would like to install rtems-libbsd,
>> --rtems is where you installed your bsp, that is, the '--prefix
On 6/06/2015 2:27 am, Daniel Gutson wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Sebastian is away at the moment so I will answer.
>is this industrial-grade fully functional, or has known issues?
This is goal.
> If it has, we could fix them.
Please test and send any issues or even better patches. We would welco
Hi,
I tried to run spsem02 test case and found that the results were not as per
mentioned in the respective document. And even document had some typos
which I have corrected in my branch.
*** BEGIN OF TEST SPSEM 2 ***
init: S0 created
init: S1 created
init: TA01 created with priority 36
init: TA02
Is this error with the default gglg priority inherit algorithm or with the onf
which restores at each unlock step? If the default algorithm, the test is
broken. If the alternative algorithm, the test needs to be reworked a bit to
check the correct behavior for each algorithm.
Fwiw the test shou
This is the test committed with the original ticket #2124 ticket see
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/2124 and
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.rtems.devel/78. The test is a bit
confusing because the output in .scn matches when configured without
RTEMS_ENABLE_STRICT_ORDER_MUTEX=1 but doesn't match
18 matches
Mail list logo
