Re: [PATCH] Fix missing include for PTHREAD_MINIMUM_STACK_SIZE

2015-08-04 Thread Jan Sommer
Am Sonntag, 2. August 2015, 12:49:21 schrieb Joel Sherrill: [...] > >Quick question: How do I build the tests? > >The configure output says "--enable-tests enable tests > >(default:samples)" > >And looking at enable-tests.m4 it seems other options are yes and no, > >so the ada-tests will b

Uniprocessor implementation of Nested Mutex problem.

2015-08-04 Thread Saurabh Gadia
Hi, So on uniprocessor can we assume that a thread calling _CORE_mutex_Seize_body or _CORE_mutex_Surrender never gets preempted or interleaved as if it holds a global lock. Whcih means that we can create a JPF model for same using global lock. Thanks, Saurabh Gadia __

Re: [PATCH] GSoC: Cache configurations Raspberry Pi 2 support

2015-08-04 Thread Rohini Kulkarni
On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:47 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Rohini Kulkarni > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Pavel Pisa > wrote: > >> > >> Hello Rohini and Gedare, > >> > >> On Friday 24 of July 2015 15:33:03 Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > What are the

Re: [PATCH] GSoC: Cache configurations Raspberry Pi 2 support

2015-08-04 Thread Rohini Kulkarni
On 5 Aug 2015 01:47, "Gedare Bloom" wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote: > >> > >> Hello Rohini and Gedare, > >> > >> On Friday 24 of July 2015 15:33:03 Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> > What are the values of b

Re: [PATCH] GSoC: Cache configurations Raspberry Pi 2 support

2015-08-04 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Rohini Kulkarni wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote: >> >> Hello Rohini and Gedare, >> >> On Friday 24 of July 2015 15:33:03 Gedare Bloom wrote: >> > What are the values of bsp_section_bss_begin, and bsp_section_bss_size? >> > >> > Appare

Re: [PATCH] GSoC: Cache configurations Raspberry Pi 2 support

2015-08-04 Thread Rohini Kulkarni
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Pavel Pisa wrote: > Hello Rohini and Gedare, > > On Friday 24 of July 2015 15:33:03 Gedare Bloom wrote: > > What are the values of bsp_section_bss_begin, and bsp_section_bss_size? > > > > Apparently, the memset is trying to write into the .text (code) > > section,

[PATCH] Covoar byte size mismatch workaround and small fixes for html generator

2015-08-04 Thread Hermann Felbinger
From a5ecb908c39ba1b84f638476c426b2770c32b52e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hermann Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:33:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] added 'rtems-cpukit' parameter to replace hardcoded paths in symbolSets.config file --- tester/covoar/DesiredSymbols.cc | 9 +++-- 1 file changed,

[PATCH] Fix hardcoded paths in RTEMS-TOOLS coverage report generator

2015-08-04 Thread Hermann Felbinger
From 4e2d9310b835f605fd8997a6c30611553026 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: hermann Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:16:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] changes such that when executing rtems-test the path to the test cases does not have to be absolute anymore --- tester/rt/coverage.py | 10 +-

Re: [PATCH] [NFS client] Respect 2^32 - 1 B NFSv2 maximum file size

2015-08-04 Thread Gedare Bloom
Can you file a ticket and refer/close it with the commit message? What versions should this be applied to? On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Nick Withers wrote: > Hi all, > > The attached patch teaches the NFS client to respect the 2^32 - 1 B > NFSv2 file size limit. > > Without this patch accesses

Re: Eliminating hardcoded paths for coverage analysis

2015-08-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 8/4/2015 9:28 AM, Hermann Felbinger wrote: Joel Sherrill mailto:joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com>> schrieb am Di., 4. Aug. 2015 um 16:06 Uhr: On 8/4/2015 7:52 AM, Hermann Felbinger wrote: > Dear all! > > I'm currently working on a coverage report generator for RTEMS. >

Re: Eliminating hardcoded paths for coverage analysis

2015-08-04 Thread Hermann Felbinger
Joel Sherrill schrieb am Di., 4. Aug. 2015 um 16:06 Uhr: > > > On 8/4/2015 7:52 AM, Hermann Felbinger wrote: > > Dear all! > > > > I'm currently working on a coverage report generator for RTEMS. > > In the current version a user has to set the absolute paths to the > libraries, which are analyzed

Re: Eliminating hardcoded paths for coverage analysis

2015-08-04 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 8/4/2015 7:52 AM, Hermann Felbinger wrote: Dear all! I'm currently working on a coverage report generator for RTEMS. In the current version a user has to set the absolute paths to the libraries, which are analyzed for coverage, in a config file, e.g., see [1]. A detailed explanation how t

Eliminating hardcoded paths for coverage analysis

2015-08-04 Thread Hermann Felbinger
Dear all! I'm currently working on a coverage report generator for RTEMS. In the current version a user has to set the absolute paths to the libraries, which are analyzed for coverage, in a config file, e.g., see [1]. A detailed explanation how to execute the test cases and how to invoke the gene