[PATCH 4/4] score: use 64-bit watchdog intervals

updates #2732 --- cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/watchdog.h | 2 +- testsuites/sptests/sp37/init.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/watchdog.h b/cpukit/score/include/rtems/score/watchdog.h index

[PATCH 2/4] posix: add clock_nanosleep and tests

updates #2732 --- cpukit/posix/src/nanosleep.c | 55 -- testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/Makefile.am| 1 + testsuites/psxtests/psxhdrs/time/clock_nanosleep.c | 35 +++ testsuites/psxtmtests/Makefile.am | 3 +

[PATCH 2/2] posix: cond_timedwait remember and use clock from condattr

updates #2745 --- cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/cond.h | 1 + cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/condimpl.h | 4 +++- cpukit/posix/src/condinit.c | 2 +- cpukit/posix/src/condtimedwait.c| 3 +++ cpukit/posix/src/condwaitsupp.c | 3 ++-

[PATCH 1/2] posix: refactor cond wait support to defer abstime conversion

updates #2745 --- cpukit/posix/include/rtems/posix/condimpl.h | 3 +-- cpukit/posix/src/condtimedwait.c| 25 + cpukit/posix/src/condwait.c | 3 +-- cpukit/posix/src/condwaitsupp.c | 29 +++-- 4 files

[PATCH 0/4] Progress toward absolute time intervals

These patches move forward toward a goal to provide support for the CLOCK_ABSTIME in POSIX. The first service targeted is the clock_nanosleep, with others to follow. The bulk of changes here are to add separate watchdog disciplines for relative and absolute time intervals. This adds timeout fields

PCIe on QorIQ?

Hi Has anyone used PCIe on a QorIQ reference board or any other QorIQ board? What functionality is missing in the empty p ci express structures in the BSP? Thanks. --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: [PATCH] Subject: Add PWM driver for beagle bone black

Hi Punit, Great to see PWM driver working Besides Martin has suggested, I would like to add few points. On 21 June 2016 at 21:56, Punit Vara wrote: > This patch adds required definitions, registers definitions and > testsuit to > test pwm driver for

Re: Mailbox RPi patch and rtems_cache_* probably broken on RPi

This could explain a number of problems reported by students trying to get their RPi peripherals working. The cache manager has never been a robust and complete implementation. I think it must be carefully looked at across targets (easier when we delete obsolete architectures!). It looks like

Re: tester failures

I also had 10 new timeouts. I'll build a clean head and compare results.. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > I ran tester for sis last night after a rebase and see 4 new failures. > I have some local changes, but I suspect the failures affect the > vanilla

tester failures

I ran tester for sis last night after a rebase and see 4 new failures. I have some local changes, but I suspect the failures affect the vanilla HEAD too. log snippets below: > run: /home/gedare/install/bin/sparc-rtems4.12-run -a -nouartrx >

Re: Errors while building rtems-libbsd

Should now work again. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP : Public key available on request. Diese Nachricht ist keine