Re: Status of libbsd on Pi and Beagle

2016-11-30 Thread Kuan Hsun Chen
Hi, Pi zero only has one core. I have Pi3 and I will try to boot RTEMS on it later on. Best, Kuan-Hsun 2016-11-30 22:33 GMT+00:00 Joel Sherrill : > > > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Alan Cudmore > wrote: > >> The Pi2 works including SMP. The $5 Pi Zero works as well. >> >> > You just spotte

Re: Status of libbsd on Pi and Beagle

2016-11-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote: > The Pi2 works including SMP. The $5 Pi Zero works as well. > > You just spotted the first mistake on my FSW slides. I forgot the Pi2. My Google shows Pi2 as a quad-core. Did something change? Is the Pi Zero multicore? > I don’t think the

Re: Status of libbsd on Pi and Beagle

2016-11-30 Thread Alan Cudmore
The Pi2 works including SMP. The $5 Pi Zero works as well. I don’t think the Pi3 will work yet, I have not tried, but I know the UART is different. The UART we usually use as the console is connected to the bluetooth module on the Pi 3. Alan > On Nov 30, 2016, at 5:13 PM, Joel Sherrill wrot

Re: Status of libbsd on Pi and Beagle

2016-11-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
I recall you had luck running on a Pi2. Did anyone ever try a Pi3? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Alan Cudmore wrote: > Libbsd on the Pi still needs some work. To me it looked like it was > getting close, but there were some timing issues preventing it from > working. I documented my status wh

Re: Status of libbsd on Pi and Beagle

2016-11-30 Thread Alan Cudmore
Libbsd on the Pi still needs some work. To me it looked like it was getting close, but there were some timing issues preventing it from working. I documented my status when I left off here: https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2016-September/016092.html

Status of libbsd on Pi and Beagle

2016-11-30 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi I was preparing an RTEMS status presentation and wondered what the status of networking was on both these platforms. Thanks. --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH 0/5] or1k: Optimisation and implementation of cache manager functions

2016-11-30 Thread Martin Erik Werner
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 07:32 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Thanks, I check in all patches to the master. If you need a back port > to 4.11, then please open a ticket. Thank you. We are carrying quite a lot of other patches on top of 4.11 (as noted/submitted in https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/