Re: Regarding running one test

2017-02-03 Thread Tanu Hari Dixit
Also is there an alternative to this (https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/chrisj/docs/user/test/index.html) page in the docs? Regards, Tanu Hari Dixit. On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Tanu Hari Dixit wrote: > Hello all, > > How do I run a single test from the

Regarding running one test

2017-02-03 Thread Tanu Hari Dixit
Hello all, How do I run a single test from the testsuites? I want to run one test from the rtems/testsuites/fstests. How do I go about doing that? Regards, Tanu Hari Dixit. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add self-contained objects chapter

2017-02-03 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 02/02/17 16:56, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > +Condition Variables > >>>+=== > >>>+ > >>>+The :c:type:`rtems_condition` provides a condition variable >

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add self-contained objects chapter

2017-02-03 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > > On 02/02/17 16:56, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > +.. c:function:: void > rtems_binary_semaphore_post(rtems_binary_semaphore > >>>*semaphore) > >>>+ > >>>+Posts the binary semaphore.

Re: [PATCH] Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS

2017-02-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 01/02/17 14:16, Sebastian Huber wrote: Rename CONFIGURE_SMP_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS to CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS since the SMP part is superfluous. I still think its worth to rename this configuration option. I would like to move it (CONFIGURE_MAXIMUM_PROCESSORS) to

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add self-contained objects chapter

2017-02-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 02/02/17 16:56, Gedare Bloom wrote: +.. c:function:: void rtems_binary_semaphore_post(rtems_binary_semaphore >>>*semaphore) >>>+ >>>+Posts the binary semaphore. In case at least one thread is waiting on >>>the >>>+binary semaphore, then the highest priority thread is woken up, >>>otherwise

Re: [PATCH] c-user: Add self-contained objects chapter

2017-02-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 02/02/17 16:56, Gedare Bloom wrote: +Condition Variables >>>+=== >>>+ >>>+The :c:type:`rtems_condition` provides a condition variable >>>synchronization >>>+object. >>>+ >>>+.. c:type:: rtems_condition >>>+ I missed saying this. Maybe 'rtems_condition_variable', or