Re: [PATCH 1/2] taskmode.c: Ensure all error checking is done before modifying executing

On 05/12/17 17:13, Joel Sherrill wrote: Also use single conditional expressions to simplify error checking. Combined, this all resulted in a block of SMP enabled error checking. Updates #3000. --- cpukit/rtems/src/taskmode.c | 33 +++-- 1 file changed, 31 insertion

Re: Duplicate __getreent()

I didn't bother to add a patch for this to the RSB. The next Newlib snapshot will pick it up. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de PGP

Re: [RTEMS Project] #3240: cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c stack addresses formatted incorrectly.

On 06/12/2017 16:06, gro...@chichak.ca wrote: > Joel, > > I followed all of Chris’ instructions as much as I understood: > You have. >> On 2017-November-16, at 21:21, Chris Johns > > wrote: >> >> On 17/11/2017 15:05, gro...@chichak.ca wrote: >

Re: [RTEMS Project] #3240: cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c stack addresses formatted incorrectly.

Joel, I followed all of Chris’ instructions as much as I understood: > On 2017-November-16, at 21:21, Chris Johns > wrote: > > On 17/11/2017 15:05, gro...@chichak.ca wrote: >> >> (I don’t know how to proceed with getting this reported/fixed.)

Re: Which automake version to use with RTEMS?

On 12/05/2017 09:01 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Jiri Gaisler > wrote: > > Building RSB installs automake-1.12.6, but RTEMS Makefile.am files > seem > to need (exactly) automake-1.13. On top of that, many linux > systems hav

Re: Which automake version to use with RTEMS?

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:55 PM, Jiri Gaisler wrote: > Building RSB installs automake-1.12.6, but RTEMS Makefile.am files seem > to need (exactly) automake-1.13. On top of that, many linux systems have > 1.15 installed by default. Is there a reason why RSB installs 1.12.6 and > not 1.13? And why c

Which automake version to use with RTEMS?

Building RSB installs automake-1.12.6, but RTEMS Makefile.am files seem to need (exactly) automake-1.13. On top of that, many linux systems have 1.15 installed by default. Is there a reason why RSB installs 1.12.6 and not 1.13? And why can't we use 1.15? Sorry if this is a dumb question, but I am

[PATCH] Account for non-preemption and interrupt level not supported on SMP

Closes #3000. --- c-user/directive_status_codes.rst | 2 +- c-user/task_manager.rst | 8 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/c-user/directive_status_codes.rst b/c-user/directive_status_codes.rst index b74f190..41fc649 100644 --- a/c-user/directive_stat

[PATCH 2/2] smpunsupported01: Add missing error check for rtems_task_mode

Update test documentation to include more cases. Updates #3000. --- testsuites/smptests/smpunsupported01/init.c | 3 +++ testsuites/smptests/smpunsupported01/smpunsupported01.doc | 4 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/testsuites/smptests/smpunsupported01/init.c b/

[PATCH 1/2] taskmode.c: Ensure all error checking is done before modifying executing

Also use single conditional expressions to simplify error checking. Combined, this all resulted in a block of SMP enabled error checking. Updates #3000. --- cpukit/rtems/src/taskmode.c | 33 +++-- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/rt

Re: [RTEMS Project] #3175: Merge FreeBSD timecounter changes from 2015-01-20 to now

On 05/12/17 15:28, RTEMS trac wrote: #3175: Merge FreeBSD timecounter changes from 2015-01-20 to now -+-- Reporter: Sebastian Huber | Owner: Sebastian Huber Type: enhancement | Status: assigned Priority: norma

Duplicate __getreent()

Hi I thought this had been addressed and it appears to be OK in the newlib master but I still see body for __getreent() in my sparc-rtems5 libc.a https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3176 Is this something that we will get the fix for when the annual newlib release occurs? Or did something go wrong si