[PATCH] bsps: More verbose bsp_fatal_extension()

2018-03-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
Close #3318. --- c/src/lib/libbsp/shared/bspclean.c | 20 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/c/src/lib/libbsp/shared/bspclean.c b/c/src/lib/libbsp/shared/bspclean.c index e5fee78961..4ed6243b57 100644 --- a/c/src/lib/libbsp/shared/bspclean.c +++ b/c/src/lib/libbsp

Re: MMU was Re: Contribute to a project under GSOC 2018

2018-03-06 Thread Abhinav Jain
Sir, Thanks a lot for the guidance. I will study the documents provided by you and will try to find more about this to increase my knowledge about Memory support. I will start preparing a draft proposal as per the template provided on the RTEMS GSoC page. Thanks and Regards Abhinav Jain On

Re: patch regarding 'RTEMS not booting with Qemu PREP larger than 256Mb'

2018-03-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
Great, thanks. Regarding the patch, I didn't notice before, but we avoid use of tabs preferring instead space characters. If you wouldn't mind reformatting the patch, that would be helpful. Later, some expert in powerpc might give more feedback. :) On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:03 PM, Éric Tremblay w

Re: patch regarding 'RTEMS not booting with Qemu PREP larger than 256Mb'

2018-03-06 Thread Éric Tremblay
Hi, I just created the ticket (#3322) with the patch in attachment. Let's hope I filled the ticket with enough information. If there is anything else you need let me know. Eric On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Éric > > It would be preferable if you could create the ticke

Re: patch regarding 'RTEMS not booting with Qemu PREP larger than 256Mb'

2018-03-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Éric Tremblay wrote: > Hi Gedare, Joel, > Unfortunately I do not have access to hw so I cannot test in this > environment. > Hmm... We will have to find someone with a board to test it. I have a few users in mind. > > Do you want me to create the ticket or one

Re: patch regarding 'RTEMS not booting with Qemu PREP larger than 256Mb'

2018-03-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
Éric It would be preferable if you could create the ticket, so we have the right "reporter" in mind later. Gedare On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Éric Tremblay wrote: > Hi Gedare, Joel, > Unfortunately I do not have access to hw so I cannot test in this > environment. > > Do you want me to cre

Re: getentropy() implementation on BBB

2018-03-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:43 AM, Udit agarwal wrote: > Hi, > Here's the updated code(I have also attached the patch PFA): > > From 96e6e1bfd8cffeef5d309eb0a07fe2bfd086ef0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Udit agarwal > Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:07:44 +0530 > Subject: [PATCH] Added getentropy suppo

Re: patch regarding 'RTEMS not booting with Qemu PREP larger than 256Mb'

2018-03-06 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Can you file a ticket with the patch attached? We don't change things on > a > > release > > branch without a ticket? devel.rtems.org > > > +1 > > > Are you able to test this on real h

Re: patch regarding 'RTEMS not booting with Qemu PREP larger than 256Mb'

2018-03-06 Thread Éric Tremblay
Hi Gedare, Joel, Unfortunately I do not have access to hw so I cannot test in this environment. Do you want me to create the ticket or one of you will take care of it? Thanks, Eric On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:02 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >

Re: patch regarding 'RTEMS not booting with Qemu PREP larger than 256Mb'

2018-03-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 5:37 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Can you file a ticket with the patch attached? We don't change things on a > release > branch without a ticket? devel.rtems.org > +1 > Are you able to test this on real hardware? It touches files in shared which > will > be used by multiple p

Re: MMU was Re: Contribute to a project under GSOC 2018

2018-03-06 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Abhinav Jain wrote: > Sir, > > Thanks for your time and consideration. I was discussing this project with > Gedare Sir and he guided me, how to proceed. > I am studying various things before proceeding with the code part but for > now, I request you to please guide

Re: getentropy() implementation on BBB

2018-03-06 Thread Udit agarwal
Hi, Here's the updated code(I have also attached the patch PFA): >From 96e6e1bfd8cffeef5d309eb0a07fe2bfd086ef0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Udit agarwal Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 20:07:44 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] Added getentropy support to BBB BSP --- bsps/arm/beagle/headers.am

Re: potential deadlock in _once

2018-03-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 06/03/18 12:12, Passas, Stavros wrote: -Original Message- From: Sebastian Huber [mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 10:19 AM To: Passas, Stavros;rtems-de...@rtems.org Subject: Re: potential deadlock in _once Yes, please open a ticket and provid

Re: [PATCH] CONFIGURE_*_SIMPLE_TASK_CONSOLE_DRIVER

2018-03-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 06/03/18 09:24, Chris Johns wrote: On 6/3/18 6:38 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/03/18 08:15, Chris Johns wrote: Should the documentation make mention of why would you select one of these console drivers? We could move the console driver options into an extra section, OK. but I am qu

RE: potential deadlock in _once

2018-03-06 Thread Passas, Stavros
-Original Message- From: Sebastian Huber [mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de] Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 10:19 AM To: Passas, Stavros ; rtems-de...@rtems.org Subject: Re: potential deadlock in _once > Yes, please open a ticket and provide a test case for the RTEMS test suite.

Re: potential deadlock in _once

2018-03-06 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 04/03/18 22:09, Passas, Stavros wrote: Hi, We have faced RTEMS threads getting locked up when using certain c++ functionality. Issue happens for example when std::future is combined with std::async. Investigating deeper, seems like this happens if std::async executes before std::future

Re: [PATCH] CONFIGURE_*_SIMPLE_TASK_CONSOLE_DRIVER

2018-03-06 Thread Chris Johns
On 6/3/18 6:38 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/03/18 08:15, Chris Johns wrote: >> Should the documentation make mention of why would you select one of these >> console drivers? > > We could move the console driver options into an extra section, OK. > but I am quite > busy at the moment, so I

Re: ARM cp15 c1 control on the BBB at _start

2018-03-06 Thread Chris Johns
On 6/3/18 6:40 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 05/03/18 23:12, Chris Johns wrote: >> Note, the Zynq does not clear the A flag in it's specific MMU set up call so >> does it assume the boot loader will clear it? >> >> Why not clear the A flag and remove any restrictions and try and make the >> BSPs