[PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. Close 3241. --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 28 ++-- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg b/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg index 6efc4e3..e0178f0 10

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/04/2018 18:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. > > Close 3241. Can you please explain why this solves the issue in the ticket? I do not see how they relate. There can be issues with a sequence of git commands if you are switching branches. This can be resolve

Re: multiple definition of __getreent (in newlib's crt0.c and RTEMS' confdefs.h)

2018-04-17 Thread Amaan Cheval
Great tips, thank you for the help! Updating the bsp_specs to replace startfile with crtbegin.o did let me get past the the __getreent problems. It seems like I'll need to learn much more about linker scripts and the GCC spec syntax than I currently know to do this right - I've currently only worke

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/04/18 10:30, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/04/2018 18:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. Close 3241. Can you please explain why this solves the issue in the ticket? I do not see how they relate. This solves the ticket since git is no longer involved. There c

Re: multiple definition of __getreent (in newlib's crt0.c and RTEMS' confdefs.h)

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/04/18 10:35, Amaan Cheval wrote: - https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/bsp-howto/linker_script.html You have to be careful with the BSP guilde. It is a bit out of date. For a reference linker command file I would use this: https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/c/src/lib/libbsp/arm/shared

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/04/18 10:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. Close 3241. --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 28 ++-- 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg b/rtems/config/tools

Re: [PATCH] cpu-supplement: Add ARM BSPs chapter

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 26/03/18 10:09, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 26/03/18 00:50, Chris Johns wrote: On 14/03/2018 17:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 13/03/18 22:58, Chris Johns wrote: On 09/03/2018 19:55, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 06/11/17 10:03, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 26/10/17 08:22, Sebastian Huber wrote:

[PATCH] bsp-howto: Update BSP source code structure

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
This patch is a part of the BSP source reorganization. Update #3285. --- bsp-howto/target_dependant_files.rst | 104 +-- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsp-howto/target_dependant_files.rst b/bsp-howto/target_dependant_files.rst ind

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/4/18 6:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/04/18 10:30, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 17/04/2018 18:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. >>> >>> Close 3241. >> Can you please explain why this solves the issue in the ticket? I do not see >> how >> they relate. >

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/4/18 7:03 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/04/18 10:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. >> >> Close 3241. >> --- >>   rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 28 ++-- >>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --g

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/4/18 8:14 pm, Chris Johns wrote: > > Also I do not want to hack around on dispatch.rtems.org to update this file. > This link seems to work ... https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/snapshot/rtems-tools-ec419a05ee52869a7d5b8712ea8e7a7d74fde096.tar.bz2 Must be a feature of cgit. Chris __

Re: [PATCH] cpu-supplement: Add ARM BSPs chapter

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 26/3/18 7:09 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 26/03/18 00:50, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 14/03/2018 17:20, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 13/03/18 22:58, Chris Johns wrote: On 09/03/2018 19:55, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 06/11/17 10:03, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 26/10/17 08:22, Seba

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/04/18 12:12, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/4/18 6:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 17/04/18 10:30, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/04/2018 18:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. Close 3241. Can you please explain why this solves the issue in the ticket? I do not see ho

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/04/18 12:26, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/4/18 8:14 pm, Chris Johns wrote: Also I do not want to hack around on dispatch.rtems.org to update this file. This link seems to work ... https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/snapshot/rtems-tools-ec419a05ee52869a7d5b8712ea8e7a7d74fde096.tar.bz2 Must b

Re: multiple definition of __getreent (in newlib's crt0.c and RTEMS' confdefs.h)

2018-04-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:35 AM, Amaan Cheval wrote: > Great tips, thank you for the help! > Updating the bsp_specs to replace startfile with crtbegin.o did let me get > past the the __getreent problems. It seems like I'll need to learn much > more about linker scripts and the GCC spec syntax tha

Re: the generated coverage report doesn't contain any data

2018-04-17 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
The report is showing some data !! I merged a lot of changes form coverage-merge , it's showing some data now , but I'm still getting a set of errors. I'll paste them below. I have attached a screenshot of the report.html errors : INFO: DesiredSymbols::createCoverageMap - Attempt to

Re: the generated coverage report doesn't contain any data

2018-04-17 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
On 18 April 2018 at 00:57, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > The report is showing some data !! > > I merged a lot of changes form coverage-merge , it's showing some data now > , but I'm still getting a set of errors. I'll paste them below. > > I have attached a screenshot of the report.html > > erro

Re: the generated coverage report doesn't contain any data

2018-04-17 Thread Cillian O'Donnell
Could be still missing something, try using the whole covoar directory from coverage-merge. I spent a good bit of time fixing errors like that, would be strange if it popped back up again but it could be right. Either way we're in pretty good shape now. Report looks good, try and run it with the fu

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/04/2018 21:18, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/04/18 12:12, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 17/4/18 6:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 17/04/18 10:30, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/04/2018 18:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. > > Close 3241. Can y

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018, 7:27 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 17/04/2018 21:18, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 17/04/18 12:12, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 17/4/18 6:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >>> On 17/04/18 10:30, Chris Johns wrote: > On 17/04/2018 18:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Download

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/04/2018 21:36, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 17/04/18 12:26, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 17/4/18 8:14 pm, Chris Johns wrote: >>> Also I do not want to hack around on dispatch.rtems.org to update this file. >>> >> This link seems to work ... >> >> https://git.rtems.org/rtems-tools/snapshot/rtems-to

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 18/04/18 02:27, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/04/2018 21:18, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 17/04/18 12:12, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/4/18 6:49 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 17/04/18 10:30, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/04/2018 18:21, Sebastian Huber wrote: Download via HTTPS RTEMS file server. Close 32

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 18/04/2018 15:07, Sebastian Huber wrote:> Sorry, for the confusion, but the tool update is not an issue for me. No problem. > My issue is the irreproducible tool chain build. Thanks for the specific task, this is an important issue. > With this time dependent > rtems-tools selection you cann

Re: [PATCH] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 18/04/18 07:22, Chris Johns wrote: With this time dependent rtems-tools selection you cannot say RSB commit XYZ works with RTEMS commit ABC. In addition you have to say build the RSB after date LMN (and not after IJK?). You build with the same RSB today and tomorrow and potentially get two dif

[PATCH v2] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Download via cgit archive. Close #3403. --- rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg | 28 ++-- rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-common-1.cfg | 12 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/rtems/config/tools/rtems-tools-5-1.cfg b/rtems

Re: [PATCH v2] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 18/04/2018 15:51, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Download via cgit archive. > > Close #3403. OK to push. Thanks Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [PATCH v2] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 18/04/18 07:51, Sebastian Huber wrote: Download via cgit archive. Close #3403. The rtems-tools-common-1.cfg seems to be only used by rtems-tools-5-1.cfg. Maybe we can merge these two files. The %{rsb_released} stuff makes the logic a bit complicated. -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains

Re: [PATCH v2] 5: Use a specific RTEMS tools version

2018-04-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 18/04/2018 15:53, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 18/04/18 07:51, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> Download via cgit archive. >> >> Close #3403. > > The rtems-tools-common-1.cfg seems to be only used by rtems-tools-5-1.cfg. > Maybe > we can merge these two files. The %{rsb_released} stuff makes the logic