(GSoC) Weekly update - release notes generator

2018-06-20 Thread Dannie Huang
Hi, My current progress and plan for next week are as follows. Current progress: Solved code consistency problem following instructions Finished code cleanup Next: Convert the output to Markdown Convert the output to HTML and PDF Best, Dannie ___

[ GSoC coverage ] weekly project status update

2018-06-20 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
Hello, This week I spent some time trying to build the leon3 bsp with -Os and -ftest-coverage options. I was getting a lot of errors with this, I tried to build with -O0 option, and it build properly. Gedare pointed in the last meeting that this might be an error with the compiler. I

[PATCH 1/2] stackchk: Refactor Stack_check_Dump_threads_usage

2018-06-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
Update #3459. --- cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c | 109 ++-- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c b/cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c index 4643e7601a..974d0eb5e5 100644 ---

[PATCH 2/2] stackchk: Add SMP support

2018-06-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
Check the interrupt stacks of all processors. Set up the interrupt stack of the current processor for high water testing in the thread begin extension. This must be done after multi-threading started, since the initialization stacks may reuse the interrupt stacks. Disable thread dispatching in

Re: All installed host tools are removed from the RTEMS sources - next steps?

2018-06-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 20/06/2018 17:02, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 20/06/18 08:57, Chris Johns wrote: >>> If we want to move it out the RTEMS sources, then there are some >>> license issues. >> What is the issue? Would the license stay as is even if the source stays the >> same or is modified? >> > > The files

Re: All installed host tools are removed from the RTEMS sources - next steps?

2018-06-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 20/06/18 08:57, Chris Johns wrote: If we want to move it out the RTEMS sources, then there are some license issues. What is the issue? Would the license stay as is even if the source stays the same or is modified? The files have no license information themself. I don't know the license

Re: All installed host tools are removed from the RTEMS sources - next steps?

2018-06-20 Thread Chris Johns
On 20/06/2018 16:18, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 18/06/18 08:57, Chris Johns wrote: >> On 18/06/2018 16:43, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> On 18/06/18 08:39, Chris Johns wrote: > What do we want to do with the standard Makefile support in "c/src/make" > and > "make"? I am not sure I

Re: All installed host tools are removed from the RTEMS sources - next steps?

2018-06-20 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 18/06/18 08:57, Chris Johns wrote: On 18/06/2018 16:43, Sebastian Huber wrote: On 18/06/18 08:39, Chris Johns wrote: What do we want to do with the standard Makefile support in "c/src/make" and "make"? I am not sure I understand what this means? We have this standard Makefile support for