GSoC requirements and suggested projects

Hello everyone, I'm at my 2 year undergraduate in Computer Science and I recently got interested in embedded systems. My current experience includes: - Operatives Systems course - Computer Architecture course (specifically studied MIPS32 architecture) - Basic knowledge of C++, python, Java programm

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 19:21, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:31 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> The MINIX license is BSD with advertising clause as I read it. That is >> less preferable to a 2-paragraph BSD license that you are likely to find in >> Freebase. Try there. >> >> Th

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

Am 12.03.19 um 10:52 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 19:21, Gedare Bloom > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:31 PM Joel Sherrill > wrote: > > The MINIX license is BSD with advertising clause as

Re: Query Regarding Old Projects, for GSoC 2019

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 3:24 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 3:57 PM Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 11/3/19 9:06 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, 2:29 PM Chris Johns > > > wrote: >> > >> > On 6/3/19 10:23 pm, Amaan Cheval wrote: >>

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 15:27, Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Am 12.03.19 um 10:52 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 19:21, Gedare Bloom > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 7:31 PM Joel

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

Am 12.03.19 um 11:35 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 15:27, Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > Am 12.03.19 um 10:52 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 at 19:21, Gedare Bloom

Re: GSoC requirements and suggested projects

Hello Federica, Welcome! We have a wide variety of projects that cover a range of programming skills and languages but mostly involves either assembly, C, or Python, and some other projects may use other languages. It seems you have the basic skills needed to try to undertake most of the projects.

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 6:59 AM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Am 12.03.19 um 11:35 schrieb Vijay Kumar Banerjee: > > > > > > > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2019 at 15:27, Christian Mauderer > > > > wrote: > > > > Am 12.0

Re: [rtems-test] sparc/erc32: RTEMS_NETWORKING, RTEMS_POSIX_API: Passed:583 Failed:1 Timeout:1 Invalid:0 Wrong:0

Is it feasible to triage the failures for out-of-memory? On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 12:22 PM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 9, 2019, 11:01 AM Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 10/3/19 2:18 am, j...@rtems.org wrote: >> > Testing time : 0:03:48.073542 >> > Average test time: 0:00:00.384610 >> >

Re: [PATCH] shell: Correct argument order of `mfill`

Tickets opened for 4.11 and 4.10: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3722 https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3723 Please provide a backported patch with commit message to close these tickets. (Any aspiring GSoC students are welcome to do the same!) Gedare On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 1:41 AM Sebastian Huber <

Re: [rtems-test] sparc/erc32: RTEMS_NETWORKING, RTEMS_POSIX_API: Passed:583 Failed:1 Timeout:1 Invalid:0 Wrong:0

My plan once all the BSPs are building again with the tester is to see which are disabled the most across the set of BSPs using xxx-testsuite.tcfg files. That should be be the set of tests which are candidates for review on how to shrink them. Chris and I chatted about this and my hope is that eve

Help Needed with arm/lm4f120 tcfg Check

Hi I have a puzzling issue after updating the lm4f120 tcfg file. I added cxx_iostream but it still tries to build it and fails. Can anyone spot why this one exclude is not working? Thanks. --joel ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rte

Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS

I don't think the build list has white listed the address these come from so passing along there are new results. -- Forwarded message - From: Date: Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 12:23 PM Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS To: Your request for analysis of RTEMS ha

Re: Help Needed with arm/lm4f120 tcfg Check

On 13/3/19 3:24 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I have a puzzling issue after updating the lm4f120 tcfg file. I added > cxx_iostream but it still tries to build it and fails. > > Can anyone spot why this one exclude is not working? What does configure show for this sample app? Does the samples Mak

Re: Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS

On 13/3/19 7:18 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I don't think the build list has white listed the address these come from so > passing along there are new results. Fixed, and sorry about forgetting to sort this out. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.o

Re: Beagleboard BSP Framebuffer

On 13/3/19 1:41 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Bringing the framebuffer codebase into libbsd from FreeBSD, and then > demonstrating it on a target (e.g., BBB), would make a solid GSoC. +1 Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/ma

Re: Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS

No problem. When I run it next time perhaps it will get through. :) --joel On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:42 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 13/3/19 7:18 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > I don't think the build list has white listed the address these come > from so > > passing along there are new results. >

[PATCH] shell: Correct argument order of `mfill`

Close #3723. (cherry picked from commit 2e8a66d13f04015c0024a084578f720ceb15ea00) --- cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c index ecbaec4878..c86e2b6a25 100644 --

[PATCH] shell: Correct argument order of `mfill`

Close #3722. (cherry picked from commit 2e8a66d13f04015c0024a084578f720ceb15ea00) --- cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c b/cpukit/libmisc/shell/main_mfill.c index d8e2fcf74c..47a55d3a2f 100644 --

Re: [PATCH] shell: Correct argument order of `mfill`

I apologize for the vagueness - It isn't clear which one is supposed to go against which branch. The only distinguishing feature is the affected ticket number. ticket 3723 is against the 4.10 branch, while 3722 is against the 4.11 branch. On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:04 PM Jonathan Brandmeyer wrot

Re: Requirement Management tools

Hello, I added a ticket and a wiki page for this topic: https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3726 https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/RequirementsEngineering -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89

Re: Doxygen @param and [in], [out] or [in,out]?

On 28/02/2019 15:52, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello, we agreed to use @param for function parameter documentation: https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/coding-doxygen.html#doxygen-best-practices Do we want to use [in], [out] or [in,out] as well? If yes, how are [in], [out] or [in,out]