On 20/04/2020 07:12, Chris Johns wrote:
On 20/4/20 1:14 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I am about to add the next couple of hundred specification items for
the RTEMS pre-qualification activity. Before I do this, I would like
to present some issues that popped up during my daily work with
On 20/4/20 1:14 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I am about to add the next couple of hundred specification items for the
RTEMS pre-qualification activity. Before I do this, I would like to
present some issues that popped up during my daily work with Doorstop.
Doorstop is a requirements mana
On 20/04/2020 07:02, Chris Johns wrote:
On 20/4/20 2:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 19/03/2020 09:32, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I started to work on a BSP for the STM32H7:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3910
I will use the new build system for this BSP.
The BSP is now available in
On 20/4/20 2:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 19/03/2020 09:32, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I started to work on a BSP for the STM32H7:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3910
I will use the new build system for this BSP.
The BSP is now available in the new build system branch:
https://git.
On 19/03/2020 09:32, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Hello,
I started to work on a BSP for the STM32H7:
https://devel.rtems.org/ticket/3910
I will use the new build system for this BSP.
The BSP is now available in the new build system branch:
https://git.rtems.org/sebh/rtems.git/log/?h=build
_
My advice in these situations is to look for an existing that that uses the
framework and see what it looks like in the source files and Makefile.am.
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 3:17 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I tried to implement the new RTEMS Test framework
> told in this mail
> http
Hello everyone,
I tried to implement the new RTEMS Test framework
told in this mail
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-April/059203.html
to pthread_getcpuclockid test suite as Dr Joel suggested
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-April/059466.html
But the terminal flashes the err
>I will create a timer using timer_create() function,
and passing CLOCK_MONOTONIC in clock_id argument.
>The test will fail as there is no support for
CLOCK_MONOTONIC in cpukit/posix/src/psxtimercreate.c.
>The added code compiles successfully without any errors.
Signed-off-by: Eshan dhawan
---
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020, 9:59 AM Richi Dubey wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> In the Covid Code-in update by Dr. Joel, he mentioned that the RTEMS could
> use some help to remove warnings from the code. In the link(
> https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/joel/warnings/warnings-5-20200408/warnings-all-5-
Hello,
I am about to add the next couple of hundred specification items for the
RTEMS pre-qualification activity. Before I do this, I would like to
present some issues that popped up during my daily work with Doorstop.
Doorstop is a requirements management tool which was selected for the
pre-
Hey everyone,
In the Covid Code-in update by Dr. Joel, he mentioned that the RTEMS could
use some help to remove warnings from the code. In the link(
https://ftp.rtems.org/pub/rtems/people/joel/warnings/warnings-5-20200408/warnings-all-5-20200408.txt)
of warnings for RTEMS 5, one of the warning is
On 19/04/2020 15:38, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:52 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
Hi,
While trying to build the examples with a fresh pull from upstream,
I got the following build error from gccdeps:
```
Build failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/lunat
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 3:52 AM Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While trying to build the examples with a fresh pull from upstream,
> I got the following build error from gccdeps:
>
> ```
> Build failed
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
> "/home/lunatic/development/rtems-examp
Hi,
While trying to build the examples with a fresh pull from upstream,
I got the following build error from gccdeps:
```
Build failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
"/home/lunatic/development/rtems-examples/.waf-2.0.19-1f3c580272b15a03d2566843c5fe872a/waflib/Task.py",
line 190, in pro
14 matches
Mail list logo
