---
Fixed incorrect register offset values for EHRPWM1A on P9_14
and EHRPWM1B on P9_16
bsps/arm/beagle/pwm/pwm.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/beagle/pwm/pwm.c b/bsps/arm/beagle/pwm/pwm.c
index 0bc5d125bf..9a346995aa 100644
--- a/bsps/arm/beagle
Hi all,
I hope that patch is ok, that was my first time using git send-email.
This patch fixes a bug in the Beaglebone BSP where the register offsets for
the PWM outputs on header pins P9_14 and P9_16 are incorrectly calculated.
I'm about to start work on adding the QEP driver to the beaglebone
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:40 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>
> hello everyone,
> I was bootstrapping my branch and got this error
> link to the branch : https://github.com/eshandhawan51/rtems/tree/ftw_test
> It has tests for FTW.H tests
> error :
> 120/121: autoreconf: testsuites/libtests/configure.ac
>
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Mritunjay Sharma
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:28 AM Heinz Junkes wrote:
>>
>> Hello, Mritunjay,
>> that's good news. Don't you want to try to develop a rsb-set for exactly
>> this combination of RTEMS4.10 and EPICS7?
>
>
> Sure, I am ready to do this an
Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure.
@Chris: Can you give a recommendation here?
Danke Heinz
--
Fritz-Haber-Institut| Phone: (+49 30) 8413-4270
Heinz Junkes | Fax (G3+G4): (+49 30) 8413-5
On Sat, Jul 4, 2020, 10:20 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 4/7/20 5:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > On 04/07/2020 01:03, Chris Johns wrote:
> >> On 3/7/20 5:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> someone from ARM changed the machine options used to build the RTEMS
> multilibs
> >>> some ti
On 05/07/2020 17:27, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Since the new build system will be a hard break, maybe we should
keep the
> options as is in the old build system and start with the new
options in the new
> build system.
This seems reasonable.
And how will we know which cha
Hello,
I removed the powerpc SPE BSP variants and the epiphany target support.
I was able to build all remaining BSPs with GCC 10 with the samples enabled.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sent from my iPhone
> On 05-Jul-2020, at 6:20 PM, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:40 AM Eshan Dhawan wrote:
>>
>> hello everyone,
>> I was bootstrapping my branch and got this error
>> link to the branch : https://github.com/eshandhawan51/rtems/tree/ftw_test
>> It
Good job!
Should these be the first entries in the RTEMS 6 release description?
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 11:12 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I removed the powerpc SPE BSP variants and the epiphany target support.
> I was able to build all remaining BSPs
If this is wrong and just caught now, should it also be applied to the 5
branch?
--joel
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 11:00 AM Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Module:rtems
> Branch:master
> Commit:d0c1ce658ed1e1510f54279f662fc8a096cae6f7
> Changeset:
> http://git.rtems.org/rtems/commit/?id=d0c1ce
On 05/07/2020 20:15, Joel Sherrill wrote:
If this is wrong and just caught now, should it also be applied to the
5 branch?
I have absolutely no idea if this is wrong or right. All I know is that
you get a compile error with this clobber using GCC 10.
___
Hi
There is a link in the Engineering Guide to Uncrustify configuration for
RTEMS. Unfortunately that link into the wiki is dead.
Does anyone have that before I ask Amar about a backup?
It needs a better home. :(
Thanks
--joel
___
devel mailing list
Hello,
As per the feedback from my mentor, I am posting all my patches
created so far to the mailing list. My patches are based on the new
build system so my mentor suggested posting a link to my GitHub
repo instead of posting the patches itself since they cannot be
directly applied to the master
On 6/7/20 12:47 am, Heinz Junkes wrote:
> Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure.
> @Chris: Can you give a recommendation here?
> Danke Heinz
> --
> Fritz-Haber-Institut| Phone: (+49 30) 8413-4270
> Heinz
On Sun, Jul 5, 2020, 6:12 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 6/7/20 12:47 am, Heinz Junkes wrote:
> > Thank you, this is exactly where I was unsure.
> > @Chris: Can you give a recommendation here?
> > Danke Heinz
> >
> --
> > Fri
16 matches
Mail list logo