On 25/8/20 12:34 am, Heinz Junkes wrote:
> Thanks Chris for the explanation. It all makes sense.
My pleasure.
> I stumbled over the following point:
>
> I tested the rc-2 and followed the Quick Guide to Building.
> “
> To build the tools for the ARM architecture:
>
> ../source-builder/sb-set-bu
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:41 AM Utkarsh Rai wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 9:34 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:27 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:32 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I have some comments below. I'm not that
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:14 AM Richi Dubey wrote:
>
> ---
> cpukit/include/rtems/scheduler.h | 6 +-
> .../include/rtems/score/schedulerstrongapa.h | 284 --
> cpukit/score/src/schedulerstrongapa.c | 913 ++
> 3 files changed, 901 insertions(+), 302 d
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 9:34 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:27 PM Utkarsh Rai
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:32 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> >>
> >> I have some comments below. I'm not that happy with the lack of design
> >> discussion during the iteration
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 9:53 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:42 AM Niteesh G. S.
> wrote:
> >
> > ping.
> >
> pong. Most of us don't volunteer our time on the weekends. Some people
> and open-source projects may, and I understand that the timeline for
> finishing your project
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:42 AM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>
> ping.
>
pong. Most of us don't volunteer our time on the weekends. Some people
and open-source projects may, and I understand that the timeline for
finishing your project is getting tight, but you do want to be
courteous about other people's
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 8:34 AM Heinz Junkes wrote:
>
> Thanks Chris for the explanation. It all makes sense.
>
> I stumbled over the following point:
>
> I tested the rc-2 and followed the Quick Guide to Building.
> “
> To build the tools for the ARM architecture:
>
> ../source-builder/sb-set-bui
Hi,
Please refer to this patch
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-August/061572.html for
reviewing my code. This new patch has some indentation corrections and
minor code fixes that I missed looking at earlier. The pull request remains
the same and can be used too.
Thank you,
Richi.
On
---
cpukit/include/rtems/scheduler.h | 6 +-
.../include/rtems/score/schedulerstrongapa.h | 284 --
cpukit/score/src/schedulerstrongapa.c | 913 ++
3 files changed, 901 insertions(+), 302 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/scheduler.h b/cpuk
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:27 PM Utkarsh Rai wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 11:32 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> I have some comments below. I'm not that happy with the lack of design
>> discussion during the iteration of this code. While it is a little
>> easier to critique the code, it is
ping.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 10:15 PM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I went through the history of the OF implementation in NetBSD and FreeBSD.
> I have summarized the things I have found out below.
>
> The first OF implementation seems to come from NetBSD this is actually
> BSD-4
> licensed
Thanks Chris for the explanation. It all makes sense.
I stumbled over the following point:
I tested the rc-2 and followed the Quick Guide to Building.
“
To build the tools for the ARM architecture:
../source-builder/sb-set-builder \
--prefix=$HOME/development/rtems/5.1-rc2 \
5/rtems-arm
To
12 matches
Mail list logo
