Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 1/3] Add helper script to find licenses.

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Mauderer
On 17/09/2020 23:35, Chris Johns wrote: > On 17/9/20 10:51 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> I think I'm ok on all three of these patches but some  >> comments on the shell script. I can see where this is a >> tedious but important check. And it can be improved easily. >> >> Since this smells like someth

[PATCH] score: Improve Scheduler Handler documentation

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
--- cpukit/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h | 23 - cpukit/include/rtems/score/schedulerimpl.h | 29 +- 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h b/cpukit/include/rtems/score/scheduler.h index 9a6

Re: [PATCH] gitignore: ignore top-level ini files

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/09/2020 20:55, Gedare Bloom wrote: ping: decision needed--should we git-ignore .ini everywhere, .ini in top-level, or just the default config.ini in top-level? I tend to ignore the top-level *.ini files. ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org ht

Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 18/09/2020 03:24, small...@aliyun.com wrote: It is a good starting place to handle the crash problem. Especially the records could be packed to send to a host computer using TCP/IP. One of the question for us is there is no network interface. But we have a flash disk. So we should modify the

Re: Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-17 Thread small...@aliyun.com
It is a good starting place to handle the crash problem. Especially the records could be packed to send to a host computer using TCP/IP. One of the question for us is there is no network interface. But we have a flash disk. So we should modify the send flow using file system instead of network.

Re: RTEMS BSP Builder and New/Old Build System

2020-09-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 7:09 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:54 AM Sebastian Huber > wrote: >> >> On 17/09/2020 01:34, Chris Johns wrote: >> >> > On 17/9/20 8:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >> Just noting that it would be nice to have a transition period where RTEMS >>

Re: License files missing on 5-freebsd-12 branch

2020-09-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/9/20 10:57 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christian Mauderer > > wrote: > > Hello, > > Chris pinged me that I missed to add these patches to the 5-freebsd-12 > branch. It would be good if we would add the

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 1/3] Add helper script to find licenses.

2020-09-17 Thread Chris Johns
On 17/9/20 10:51 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > I think I'm ok on all three of these patches but some  > comments on the shell script. I can see where this is a > tedious but important check. And it can be improved easily. > > Since this smells like something Chris would poke me f > or and call a "Joe

Re: [PATCH] cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose: Fix format truncation warning

2020-09-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 1:07 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 7:15 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 17/9/20 9:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020, 6:43 PM Chris Johns > > > wrote: > > > > > > On 16/9/20 11:42 pm, Joel Sherrill wro

Re: [PATCH] cpukit/mghttpd/mongoose: Fix format truncation warning

2020-09-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 7:15 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 17/9/20 9:50 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020, 6:43 PM Chris Johns > > wrote: > > > > On 16/9/20 11:42 pm, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > snprintf() is a safe method and I strongly disagree wit

Re: [PATCH] gitignore: ignore top-level ini files

2020-09-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
ping: decision needed--should we git-ignore .ini everywhere, .ini in top-level, or just the default config.ini in top-level? On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:51 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 15/9/20 9:52 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > hah, yes. In rtems.git with the new build system it seems the workflow >

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Add rtems_task_construct()

2020-09-17 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:32 AM Sebastian Huber wrote: > > Hello Chris and Joel, > > On 17/09/2020 01:39, Chris Johns wrote: > > Looks good. > > > > Thanks for your patience as we worked through this change. I think the > > outcome > > is solid and reflects the efforts made. > thanks for your de

Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] Add rtems_task_construct()

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Chris and Joel, On 17/09/2020 01:39, Chris Johns wrote: Looks good. Thanks for your patience as we worked through this change. I think the outcome is solid and reflects the efforts made. thanks for your detailed review. I think it was worth the trouble. The API is now much better compare

Re: does rtems 5.1 support create a core dump file when accessing a invalid address or other fatal errors?

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello, On 15/09/2020 12:58, small...@aliyun.com wrote: I am developing applications in rtems 5.1. As we know, my application and rtems kernel are both in the same address space. So if my application access an invalid address or encounter other fatal errors, I want the kernel not just being hung

Re: RTEMS BSP Builder and New/Old Build System

2020-09-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:54 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 17/09/2020 01:34, Chris Johns wrote: > > > On 17/9/20 8:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Just noting that it would be nice to have a transition period where > RTEMS BSP > >> Builder supported both bui

Re: License files missing on 5-freebsd-12 branch

2020-09-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christian Mauderer < christian.maude...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > Hello, > > Chris pinged me that I missed to add these patches to the 5-freebsd-12 > branch. It would be good if we would add the license files to the > release branch too. This will allow users to

Re: [PATCH rtems-libbsd 1/3] Add helper script to find licenses.

2020-09-17 Thread Joel Sherrill
I think I'm ok on all three of these patches but some comments on the shell script. I can see where this is a tedious but important check. And it can be improved easily. Since this smells like something Chris would poke me f or and call a "Joel script" :) On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:33 AM Christian

[PATCH rtems-libbsd 3/3] Import FreeBSD license files.

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Mauderer
Fix #4082 --- freebsd/COPYRIGHT | 126 ++ freebsd/contrib/expat/COPYING | 21 + freebsd/contrib/libpcap/LICENSE | 19 freebsd/contrib/libxo/LICENSE | 23 + freebsd/contrib/tcpdump/LICENSE | 19 freebsd/co

License files missing on 5-freebsd-12 branch

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Mauderer
Hello, Chris pinged me that I missed to add these patches to the 5-freebsd-12 branch. It would be good if we would add the license files to the release branch too. This will allow users to easily find the correct licenses. Best regards Christian ___

[PATCH rtems-libbsd 2/3] builder.py: Add case for plain text files.

2020-09-17 Thread Christian Mauderer
Update #4082 --- builder.py | 8 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/builder.py b/builder.py index f5fe2afc..0eda461f 100755 --- a/builder.py +++ b/builder.py @@ -202,6 +202,9 @@ def revertFixLocalIncludes(data): data = re.sub('#include ]*)>', '#include "\\1"', data) r

Re: RTEMS BSP Builder and New/Old Build System

2020-09-17 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 17/09/2020 01:34, Chris Johns wrote: On 17/9/20 8:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: Just noting that it would be nice to have a transition period where RTEMS BSP Builder supported both build systems for comparison purposes. I prefer this be as short as possible. What about 1st Nov 2020? I added