Re: Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Andrew Butterfield
HI Sebastian, reading https://docs.rtems.org/branches/master/eng/vc-users.html (Sec 6.1.3 Making Changes), I found the following sequence that fixed things. git checkout master git pull git checkout git rebase master Now the document

[PATCH v2 1/2] bsps/shared/ofw: Implement RTEMS OFW interface

2020-11-03 Thread G S Niteesh Babu
RTEMS OFW is a FDT only implementation of the OpenFirmWare interface. This API is created to be compatible with FreeBSD OpenFirmWare interface. The main intention is to make porting of FreeBSD drivers to RTEMS easier. Most functions implemented have an direct one-one mapping with the original OFW

[PATCH v2 2/2] libtests/ofw01: Added a test for RTEMS OFW

2020-11-03 Thread G S Niteesh Babu
Added a basic test for the implemented RTEMS OFW API. --- spec/build/testsuites/libtests/grp.yml | 2 + spec/build/testsuites/libtests/ofw01.yml | 21 +++ testsuites/libtests/ofw01/init.c | 187 +++ testsuites/libtests/ofw01/ofw01.doc | 29 testsuites/li

Re: Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Hi Sebastian, I thought `git submodule update` would do it - my bad I tried `git submodule sync`, but this still leaves me back in 3rd July 2020 Doing a `git pull` afterwards, in rtems-docs makes no change. What do I need to do to bring all the submodules up to date? Thanks, Andrew > On 3

Re: Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Hi Sebatian, sorry - a typo - the line was . env/bin/active as it says in the rtems-central README.md file. I was running in the venv - I just edited out all the (env) indicators... > On 3 Nov 2020, at 17:59, Sebastian Huber > wrote: > > On 03/11/2020 18:47, Andrew Butterfield wrote: > >>

Re: How does RTEMS decide which process to execute next on calling rtems_task_exit

2020-11-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Richi, the task termination sequence is quite complicated. The last action of a task is executing _Thread_Make_zombie(). -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16 Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09 E-Mail : seba

Re: Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 03/11/2020 18:47, Andrew Butterfield wrote: $ ./waf Waf: Entering directory `/Users/butrfeld/REPOS/rtems-central/modules/rtems-docs/build' Build: 6.0c13e94-modified (3rd July 2020) This is an extremely out dated version. You should see something like this: Waf: Entering directory `/home

Re: Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 03/11/2020 18:47, Andrew Butterfield wrote: cp git-hooks/sanity-check.sh .git/hooks/pre-push git submodule update make env env/bin/activate This doesn't active the virtual environment. You need: source env/bin/activate -- Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-8

Re: Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Hi Sebastian, I went back up to rtems-central and started over cp git-hooks/sanity-check.sh .git/hooks/pre-push git submodule update make env env/bin/activate cd modules/rtems-docs/ I made more progress, being able to complete ./waf configure $ ./waf configure Setting top to

Re: How does RTEMS decide which process to execute next on calling rtems_task_exit

2020-11-03 Thread Richi Dubey
Hi, Can someone please help me out with this? Is what I am asking not correct/not making sense? Let me know. Thanks, Richi. On Mon, 2 Nov 2020, 21:43 Richi Dubey, wrote: > Hi, > > While debugging sp16.exe, when Task_1 calls rtems_task_wake_after, > following the stack trace would lead us to th

Re: Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 03/11/2020 17:00, Andrew Butterfield wrote: I am trying to edit RTEMS docs to fix an error regarding large comments (ticket #4163). I'm working out of the rtems-doc submodule of rtems-central, and following instructions in the Soft Eng manual (6.1 Soft Devpt (Git users) I have created a

Problem re-building RTEMS docs

2020-11-03 Thread Andrew Butterfield
Dear all, I am trying to edit RTEMS docs to fix an error regarding large comments (ticket #4163). I'm working out of the rtems-doc submodule of rtems-central, and following instructions in the Soft Eng manual (6.1 Soft Devpt (Git users) I have created a branch and edited rtems-docs/eng/coding-