Re: Buildbot failure in RTEMS on powerpc/psim FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE GCC 7.3.0 POSIX

On 01/02/2021 14:54, build...@rtems.org wrote: The Buildbot has detected a failed build on builder powerpc/psim FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE GCC 7.3.0 POSIX while building rtems. Full details are available at: https://buildbot.rtems.org/#builders/19/builds/405 The powerpc build is broken with the o

Re: Porting ptpd to rtems

On 2/2/21 12:15 am, gabriel.moy...@dlr.de wrote: > Hi Chris, > > I hope you are doing well. I am and thank you for asking. > Last year I asked about running ptpd on RTEMS > https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-September/062208.html >

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On 2/2/21 9:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:50 PM Chris Johns > wrote: > On 2/2/21 3:42 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass > most of > > the time

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 3:50 PM Chris Johns wrote: > On 2/2/21 3:42 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > Hi > > > > On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass > most of > > the time but fail intermittently. It appears to be based somewhat on > host load > > but there may be o

Re: [PATCH] user: add guidance on version numbers to GSoC guide.

+1 On 2/2/21 7:51 am, Gedare Bloom wrote: > --- > user/start/gsoc.rst | 6 ++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/user/start/gsoc.rst b/user/start/gsoc.rst > index 7f27d7b..f8167b9 100644 > --- a/user/start/gsoc.rst > +++ b/user/start/gsoc.rst > @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ delving into

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On 2/2/21 3:42 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass most > of > the time but fail intermittently. It appears to be based somewhat on host load > but there may be other factors.  > > There does not appear to be a good test resu

[PATCH] user: add guidance on version numbers to GSoC guide.

--- user/start/gsoc.rst | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/user/start/gsoc.rst b/user/start/gsoc.rst index 7f27d7b..f8167b9 100644 --- a/user/start/gsoc.rst +++ b/user/start/gsoc.rst @@ -20,6 +20,12 @@ delving into the details. For more information you can go through the ot

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:02 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:56 AM Peter Dufault wrote: > >> Can the test be marked as a possible emulator failure? For example (I >> haven't looked at the report) use "?" (Huh?) and not "!" (Failed!) or "." >> )(Passed), that is, the test

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:56 AM Peter Dufault wrote: > Can the test be marked as a possible emulator failure? For example (I > haven't looked at the report) use "?" (Huh?) and not "!" (Failed!) or "." > )(Passed), that is, the test failed as an emulated system and the RTEMS > project suspects th

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

Can the test be marked as a possible emulator failure? For example (I haven't looked at the report) use "?" (Huh?) and not "!" (Failed!) or "." )(Passed), that is, the test failed as an emulated system and the RTEMS project suspects the emulation itself is causing this. You shouldn't be allowe

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021, 11:45 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:31 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:42 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >>> Hi On the aarch64 qemu testing, we a

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:31 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:42 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: >> >>> Hi >>> >>> On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass >>> most of the time but fail

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 11:14 AM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:42 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Hi >> >> On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass >> most of the time but fail intermittently. It appears to be based somewhat >> on host load but th

Re: How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:42 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass > most of the time but fail intermittently. It appears to be based somewhat > on host load but there may be other factors. > > There does not appear to be a good t

How to Classify Intermittent Test Failures

Hi On the aarch64 qemu testing, we are seeing some tests which seem to pass most of the time but fail intermittently. It appears to be based somewhat on host load but there may be other factors. There does not appear to be a good test results state for these. Marking them expected pass or fail me

Re: [PATCH v2] score: Define _Assert() for static analysis runs

Thanks, I like that. On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:07 PM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > The goal is to reduce false positive NULL_RETURNS, > PW.NORETURN_FUNCTION_DOES_RETURN, PW.SET_BUT_NOT_USED, > UNUSED_VALUE, etc. issues produced by Coverity. > > Define RTEMS_STATI

Porting ptpd to rtems

Hi Chris, I hope you are doing well. Last year I asked about running ptpd on RTEMS https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2020-September/062208.html. May I ask about the last state of this? Thanks in advance, Gabriel -- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. (D