Re: How to run the full RTEMS testsuite

2021-04-10 Thread Eshan Dhawan
> On 11-Apr-2021, at 1:15 AM, Ida Delphine wrote: > >  > For some reason I get this: > rtems-test: command not found > I've used this command a few times and it worked. I don't know what I am > doing wrong now... > Any idea what I am doing wrong? Did you add the path to the toolchain to your

[PATCH] covoar/TargetBase.h: Remove unused member variables

2021-04-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
Both flagged by CID #1399638. --- tester/covoar/TargetBase.h | 13 - 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/covoar/TargetBase.h b/tester/covoar/TargetBase.h index d13216d..6db08f2 100644 --- a/tester/covoar/TargetBase.h +++ b/tester/covoar/TargetBase.h @@ -122,19 +122,6

Re: How to run the full RTEMS testsuite

2021-04-10 Thread Ida Delphine
For some reason I get this: rtems-test: command not found I've used this command a few times and it worked. I don't know what I am doing wrong now... Any idea what I am doing wrong? On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 12:43 PM Eshan Dhawan wrote: > Hi > You can use rtems-test to run tests in a directory >

[PATCH RTEMS v2 0/1] bsp/beagle: Refactored i2c driver and Updated

2021-04-10 Thread G S Niteesh Babu
The following two patches update the Beagle BSP i2c driver to use device tree based initialization and the documentation related to it. G S Niteesh Babu (1): bsps/beagle: Refactored i2c driver bsps/arm/beagle/i2c/bbb-i2c.c | 122 ++

[PATCH RTEMS v2 1/1] bsps/beagle: Refactored i2c driver

2021-04-10 Thread G S Niteesh Babu
Refactored the i2c driver to parse register values from the device tree rather than hardcoding them. But still the clocks have to initialized manually. --- bsps/arm/beagle/i2c/bbb-i2c.c | 122 ++ bsps/arm/beagle/include/bsp.h | 4 +

[PATCH RTEMS-docs] user/bsps/arm/beagle: Update i2c initialization instructions

2021-04-10 Thread G S Niteesh Babu
The new i2c driver in the beagle BSP uses FDT based initialization. This updates the documentation of the BSP about the same. --- user/bsps/arm/beagle.rst | 41 +++- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/bsps/arm/beagle.rst

Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc/shared/console: Console baud rate fixes

2021-04-10 Thread dufault
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 08:41 , wrote: > > The "powerpc/shared/console" code has the start-up console value fixed > at 9600 baud. This changes the hard-wired constant "9600" in the code > to the configuration setting "BSP_CONSOLE_BAUD" and adds configuration > support in both the "waf" and

[PATCH v2 0/2] powerpc/shared/console: Console baud rate fixes

2021-04-10 Thread dufault
From: Peter Dufault The "powerpc/shared/console" code has the start-up console value fixed at 9600 baud. This changes the hard-wired constant "9600" in the code to the configuration setting "BSP_CONSOLE_BAUD" and adds configuration support in both the "waf" and the legacy configuration systems.

[PATCH v2 1/2] powerpc/shared/console: Make console baud rate configurable.

2021-04-10 Thread dufault
From: Peter Dufault The "powerpc/shared/console" code has the start-up console value fixed at 9600 baud. This changes the hard-wired constant "9600" in the code to the configuration setting "BSP_CONSOLE_BAUD" and adds configuration support in both the "waf" and the legacy configuration systems.

[PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/shared/console: "termios" first open sets console baud to 9600

2021-04-10 Thread dufault
From: Peter Dufault When the PowerPC shared console baud rate starts at anything other than 9600 the termios code will set it to 9600 at the first open. --- bsps/powerpc/shared/console/uart.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/shared/console/uart.c

Re: How to run the full RTEMS testsuite

2021-04-10 Thread Eshan Dhawan
Hi You can use rtems-test to run tests in a directory Eg : rtems-test --rtems-bsp=erc32-run --rtems-tools=$HOME/development/rtems/5 ~/development/rtems/kernel/erc32/sparc-rtems5/c/erc32/testsuites/samples Thanks Eshan > On 10-Apr-2021, at 5:01 PM, Ida Delphine wrote: > >  > Hello

How to run the full RTEMS testsuite

2021-04-10 Thread Ida Delphine
Hello everyone, I'm looking forward to work on automatic style checking and code formatting for RTEMS as my GSoC project and will need to test that style changes do not cause any implementation bugs. I will carryout this test by running the full RTEMS testsuite. I've tried looking in the RTEMS